Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34062339›Full record

ArticleCognition2021

Limited memory for ensemble statistics in visual change detection.

William J Harrison, Jessica M V McMaster, Paul M Bays

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How general is ensemble perception?Psychological research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William J HarrisonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK; Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, QBI Building 79, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, McElwain Building 24a, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia. Electronic address: willjharri@gmail.com.
Jessica M V McMasterDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.
Paul M BaysDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 106926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accounts of working memory based on independent item representations may overlook a possible contribution of ensemble statistics, higher-order regularities of a scene such as the mean or variance of a visual attribute. Here we used change detection tasks to investigate the hypothesis that observers store ensemble statistics in working memory and use them to detect changes in the visual environment. We controlled changes to the ensemble mean or variance between memory and test displays across six experiments. We made specific predictions of observers' sensitivity using an optimal summation model that integrates evidence across separate items but does not detect changes in ensemble statistics. We found strong evidence that observers outperformed this model, but only when task difficulty was high, and only for changes in stimulus variance. Under these conditions, we estimated that the variance of items contributed to change detection sensitivity more strongly than any individual item in this case. In contrast, however, we found strong evidence against the hypothesis that the average feature value is stored in working memory: when the mean of memoranda changed, sensitivity did not differ from the optimal summation model, which was blind to the ensemble mean, in five out of six experiments. Our results reveal that change detection is primarily limited by uncertainty in the memory of individual features, but that memory for the variance of items can facilitate detection under a limited set of conditions that involve relatively high working memory demands.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermVisual PerceptionHumansUncertaintyChange detectionEnsemble statisticsOptimal observer modelShort term memorySignal detection theoryVisual working memory

Identifiers

PMID34062339
PMCPMC7614705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.