Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34062207›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology2021

Molecular determinants of pro-arrhythmia proclivity of d- and l-sotalol via a multi-scale modeling pipeline.

Kevin R DeMarco, Pei-Chi Yang, Vikrant Singh, Kazuharu Furutani, John R D Dawson, Mao-Tsuen Jeng, James C Fettinger, Slava Bekker, Van A Ngo, Sergei Y Noskov and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Harnessing AlphaFold to reveal hERG channel conformational state secrets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kevin R DeMarcoDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Pei-Chi YangDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Vikrant SinghDepartment of Pharmacology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Kazuharu FurutaniDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokushima Bunri University, Tokushima, Tokushima 770-8514, Japan.
John R D DawsonDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Biophysics Graduate Group, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Mao-Tsuen JengDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
James C FettingerDepartment of Chemistry, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Slava BekkerDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Science and Engineering, American River College, Sacramento, CA 95841, USA.
Van A NgoCentre for Molecular Simulation and Biochemistry Research Cluster, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N1N4, Canada.
Sergei Y NoskovCentre for Molecular Simulation and Biochemistry Research Cluster, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N1N4, Canada.
Vladimir Yarov-YarovoyDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Jon T SackDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Heike WulffDepartment of Pharmacology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Colleen E ClancyDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Pharmacology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Igor VorobyovDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Pharmacology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: ivorobyov@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Calgary · CAAmerican River College · US

Funding

Development of the Predictive NeuroCardiovascular SimulatorOT2OD026580 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CLANCY, COLLEEN E, GRANDI, ELEONORA · 2018 to 2021
$5.7M
In silico Safety PharmacologyR01HL128537 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CLANCY, COLLEEN E, SANTANA, LUIS F · 2016 to 2024
$5.7M
Predictive multiscale in silico cardio-pharmacologyU01HL126273 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CLANCY, COLLEEN E · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
Breakthrough Molecular Dynamics Research via an Anton2 SupercomputerR01GM116961 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI BLOOD, PHILIP D. · 2016 to 2023
$3.0M
Multi-Scale Modeling of Vascular Signaling UnitsR01HL152681 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CLANCY, COLLEEN E, SANTANA, LUIS F · 2020 to 2023
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128537NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL152681NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL126273NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116961NIH HHS OT2 OD026580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug isomers may differ in their proarrhythmia risk. An interesting example is the drug sotalol, an antiarrhythmic drug comprising d- and l- enantiomers that both block the hERG cardiac potassium channel and confer differing degrees of proarrhythmic risk. We developed a multi-scale in silico pipeline focusing on hERG channel - drug interactions and used it to probe and predict the mechanisms of pro-arrhythmia risks of the two enantiomers of sotalol. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations predicted comparable hERG channel binding affinities for d- and l-sotalol, which were validated with electrophysiology experiments. MD derived thermodynamic and kinetic parameters were used to build multi-scale functional computational models of cardiac electrophysiology at the cell and tissue scales. Functional models were used to predict inactivated state binding affinities to recapitulate electrocardiogram (ECG) QT interval prolongation observed in clinical data. Our study demonstrates how modeling and simulation can be applied to predict drug effects from the atom to the rhythm for dl-sotalol and also increased proarrhythmia proclivity of d- vs. l-sotalol when accounting for stereospecific beta-adrenergic receptor blocking.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsCryoelectron MicroscopyEther-A-Go-Go Potassium ChannelsHEK293 CellsHumansLong QT SyndromeMolecular Dynamics SimulationMyocytes, CardiacPotassium Channel BlockersProtein BindingSignal TransductionSotalolStereoisomerismAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsEther-A-Go-Go Potassium ChannelsPotassium Channel BlockersSotalolArrhythmiaBeta-blockerEnantiomerIon channelMolecular dynamicsStereochemistry

Identifiers

PMID34062207
PMCPMC8906354
OpenAlexW3165275639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.