Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34061856›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

IHR-PVS National Bridging Workshops, a tool to operationalize the collaboration between human and animal health while advancing sector-specific goals in countries.

Guillaume Belot, François Caya, Kaylee Myhre Errecaborde, Tieble Traore, Brice Lafia, Artem Skrypnyk, Djhane Montabord, Maud Carron, Susan Corning, Rajesh Sreedharan and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Guillaume BelotWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5736-2673
François CayaWorld Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Paris, France.
Kaylee Myhre ErrecabordeWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tieble TraoreWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Brice LafiaWorld Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) Regional Representation for Africa, Bamako, Mali.
Artem SkrypnykWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Djhane MontabordWorld Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) Sub-Regional Representation for Central Asia, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Maud CarronWorld Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Paris, France.
Susan CorningWorld Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Paris, France.
Rajesh SreedharanWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nicolas IslaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tanja SchmidtWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gyanendra GongalWorld Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.
Dalia SamhouriWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt.
Enrique Perez-GutierrezPan American Health Organization / World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7730-899X
Ana Riviere-CinnamondPan American Health Organization / World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas, Washington, United States of America.
Jun XingWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stella ChungongWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stephane de la RocqueWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaborative, One Health approaches support governments to effectively prevent, detect and respond to emerging health challenges, such as zoonotic diseases, that arise at the human-animal-environmental interfaces. To overcome these challenges, operational and outcome-oriented tools that enable animal health and human health services to work specifically on their collaboration are required. While international capacity and assessment frameworks such as the IHR-MEF (International Health Regulations-Monitoring and Evaluation Framework) and the OIE PVS (Performance of Veterinary Services) Pathway exist, a tool and process that could assess and strengthen the interactions between human and animal health sectors was needed. Through a series of six phased pilots, the IHR-PVS National Bridging Workshop (NBW) method was developed and refined. The NBW process gathers human and animal health stakeholders and follows seven sessions, scheduled across three days. The outputs from each session build towards the next one, following a structured process that goes from gap identification to joint planning of corrective measures. The NBW process allows human and animal health sector representatives to jointly identify actions that support collaboration while advancing evaluation goals identified through the IHR-MEF and the OIE PVS Pathway. By integrating sector-specific and collaborative goals, the NBWs help countries in creating a realistic, concrete and practical joint road map for enhanced compliance to international standards as well as strengthened preparedness and response for health security at the human-animal interface.

Indexed as

One HealthAnimalsCooperative BehaviorGlobal HealthGoalsHumansInternational CooperationZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID34061856
PMCPMC8168895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.