Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34061844›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2021

Vitamin D and COVID-19 susceptibility and severity in the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative: A Mendelian randomization study.

Guillaume Butler-Laporte, Tomoko Nakanishi, Vincent Mooser, David R Morrison, Tala Abdullah, Olumide Adeleye, Noor Mamlouk, Nofar Kimchi, Zaman Afrasiabi, Nardin Rezk and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mendelian Randomization and Infection: Pitfalls and Promises.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Prospective study design and data analysis in UK Biobank.Science translational medicine · 2024
    Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Guillaume Butler-LaporteLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-0396
Tomoko NakanishiLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9510-5646
Vincent MooserDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
David R MorrisonLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Tala AbdullahLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7195-5045
Olumide AdeleyeLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Noor MamloukLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Nofar KimchiLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Zaman AfrasiabiLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Nardin RezkLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5358-7704
Annarita GilibertiMedical Genetics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Alessandra RenieriMedical Genetics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0846-9220
Yiheng ChenLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Sirui ZhouLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Vincenzo ForgettaLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6061-4720
J Brent RichardsLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3746-9086
Jewish General Hospital · CAUniversity of Siena · ITJapan Society for the Promotion of Science · JPKing's College London · GBMcGill University · CATechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased vitamin D levels, as reflected by 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) measurements, have been proposed to protect against COVID-19 based on in vitro, observational, and ecological studies. However, vitamin D levels are associated with many confounding variables, and thus associations described to date may not be causal. Vitamin D Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have provided results that are concordant with large-scale vitamin D randomized trials. Here, we used 2-sample MR to assess evidence supporting a causal effect of circulating 25OHD levels on COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. METHODS AND

findingsGenetic variants strongly associated with 25OHD levels in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 443,734 participants of European ancestry (including 401,460 from the UK Biobank) were used as instrumental variables. GWASs of COVID-19 susceptibility, hospitalization, and severe disease from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative were used as outcome GWASs. These included up to 14,134 individuals with COVID-19, and up to 1,284,876 without COVID-19, from up to 11 countries. SARS-CoV-2 positivity was determined by laboratory testing or medical chart review. Population controls without COVID-19 were also included in the control groups for all outcomes, including hospitalization and severe disease. Analyses were restricted to individuals of European descent when possible. Using inverse-weighted MR, genetically increased 25OHD levels by 1 standard deviation on the logarithmic scale had no significant association with COVID-19 susceptibility (odds ratio [OR] = 0.95; 95% CI 0.84, 1.08; p = 0.44), hospitalization (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.33; p = 0.41), and severe disease (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.77, 1.22; p = 0.77). We used an additional 6 meta-analytic methods, as well as conducting sensitivity analyses after removal of variants at risk of horizontal pleiotropy, and obtained similar results. These results may be limited by weak instrument bias in some analyses. Further, our results do not apply to individuals with vitamin D deficiency.

conclusionsIn this 2-sample MR study, we did not observe evidence to support an association between 25OHD levels and COVID-19 susceptibility, severity, or hospitalization. Hence, vitamin D supplementation as a means of protecting against worsened COVID-19 outcomes is not supported by genetic evidence. Other therapeutic or preventative avenues should be given higher priority for COVID-19 randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideSeverity of Illness IndexAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesCausalityCOVID-19Dietary SupplementsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHospitalizationHumansMaleMendelian Randomization AnalysisMiddle Aged25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID34061844
PMCPMC8168855
OpenAlexW3165002431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.