ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2021
Mix Contrast for COVID-19 Mild-to-Critical Prediction.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- DDE: Deep Dynamic Epidemiological Modeling for Infectious Illness Development Forecasting in Multi-level Geographic Entities.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2024Article
- Lung pneumonia severity scoring in chest X-ray images using transformers.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Article
- The Dynamic Immunological Parameter Landscape in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients With Different Outcomes.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn a few patients with mild COVID-19, there is a possibility of the infection becoming severe or critical in the future. This work aims to identify high-risk patients who have a high probability of changing from mild to critical COVID-19 (only account for 5% of cases).
methodsUsing traditional convolutional neural networks for classification may not be suitable to identify this 5% of high risk patients from an entire dataset due to the highly imbalanced label distribution. To address this problem, we propose a Mix Contrast model, which matches original features with mixed features for contrastive learning. Three modules are proposed for training the model: 1) a cumulative learning strategy for synthesizing the mixed feature; 2) a commutative feature combination module for learning the commutative law of feature concatenation; 3) a united pairwise loss assigning adaptive weights for sample pairs with different class anchors based on their current optimization status.
resultsWe collect a multi-center computed tomography dataset including 918 confirmed COVID-19 patients from four hospitals and evaluate the proposed method on both the COVID-19 mild-to-critical prediction and COVID-19 diagnosis tasks. For mild-to-critical prediction, the experimental results show a recall of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.815. For diagnosis, the model shows comparable results with deep neural networks using a large dataset. Our method demonstrates improvements when the amount of training data is small or imbalanced. SIGNIFICANCE: Identifying mild-to-critical COVID-19 patients is important for early prevention and personalized treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.