Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34061336›Full record

ArticleJournal of nephrology2021

Why and how should we promote home dialysis for patients with end-stage kidney disease during and after the coronavirus 2019 disease pandemic? A French perspective.

Guy Rostoker, Belkacem Issad, Hafedh Fessi, Ziad A Massy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prescribing the dialysis dose and treatment frequency in home haemodialysis.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guy RostokerDepartment of Nephrology and Dialysis, Hôpital Privé Claude Galien, Ramsay Santé, Quincy-sous-Sénart, France. rostotom@orange.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-4383-3825
Belkacem IssadPeritoneal Dialysis Centre, Nephrology Department, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3562-0106
Hafedh FessiHome Haemodialysis Unit, Nephrology and Dialysis Department, Hôpital Tenon AP-HP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7458-2862
Ziad A MassyNephrology Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, APHP, Boulogne; and INSERM Unit 1018, CESP, University Versailles-St Quentin, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5771-5996
Sorbonne Université · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health crisis induced by the pandemic of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) has had a major impact on dialysis patients in France. The incidence of infection with acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic was 3.3% among dialysis patients-13 times higher than in the general population. The corresponding mortality rate was high, reaching 21%. As of 19th April, 2021, the cumulative prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in French dialysis patients was 14%. Convergent scientific data from France, Italy, the United Kingdom and Canada show that home dialysis reduces the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection by a factor of at least two. Unfortunately, home dialysis in France is not sufficiently developed: the proportion of dialysis patients being treated at home is only 7%. The obstacles to the provision of home care for patients with end-stage kidney disease in France include (i) an unfavourable pricing policy for home haemodialysis and nurse visits for assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD), (ii) insufficient training in home dialysis for nephrologists, (iii) the small number of administrative authorizations for home dialysis programs, and (iv) a lack of structured, objective information on renal replacement therapies for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). We propose a number of pragmatic initiatives that could be simultaneously enacted to improve the situation in three areas: (i) the provision of objective information on renal replacement therapies for patients with advanced CKD, (ii) wider authorization of home dialysis networks and (iii) price increases in favour of home dialysis procedures.

Indexed as

COVID-19Kidney Failure, ChronicHemodialysis, HomeHumansPandemicsRenal DialysisSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Home DialysisHome HaemodialysisPeritoneal DialysisSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34061336
PMCPMC8167385
OpenAlexW3164264521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.