ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022
Do Multiple Brain Lesions Always Connote Worse Outcomes? Appraisal Evidence from a Tertiary Care Center in Koshi/Purbanchal Province of Nepal.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in medicine comprising diverse diagnostic and management modalities call for a bundle approach to improve patient care. This study aimed to present diagnostic patterns in patients with multiple intracranial lesions together with connoted survival implications. We retrospectively reviewed medical files of 85 patients with tumor and non-tumor intracranial lesions. Metastatic brain lesions were identified in 23.5% of patients. Neurological pathogenesis underlay 29.4%, infectious 21.2%, and vascular 14.1% of lesions, with the remaining portion comprising less frequent disorders. A favorable prognosis was predicted in 52/85 (61.2%) of the study population despite a variety of pathologies, which speaks for substantial improvements in outcomes of once hardly manageable or mortal brain disorders, comprising both common and rare conditions. The improvements are to the credit of advances in medical radio-imaging enhancing the diagnostic power which enables a precise stratification of brain pathologies. We emphasize the use of an algorithmic evaluation of patients presenting with multiple brain lesions for differential diagnosis and survival prognostication. There seems to be an ongoing transition from imperfect probabilistic prediction models to precision medicine, which determines advantages in disease management and outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34061333What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.