Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34061293›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2022

The Identification of Low-risk Gambling Limits for Specific Gambling Activities.

N A Dowling, G J Youssef, C Greenwood, S S Merkouris, A Suomi, R Room

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

N A DowlingSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia. nicki.dowling@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8592-2407
G J YoussefSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-4895
C GreenwoodSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9211-6312
S S MerkourisSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9037-6121
A SuomiResearch School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2600, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4254-3893
R RoomCentre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5618-385X

Funding

Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Round 6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An emerging literature has identified optimal low-risk gambling limits in an effort to reduce gambling-related harm. Concerns have, however, been raised about the construction of aggregate low-risk limits that are applied to all gambling activities and there is support from gambling experts and the general public in Australia for the identification of low-risk limits for specific gambling activities. The study's aim was to identify and evaluate a set of empirically-based activity-specific limits (gambling frequency, gambling expenditure, gambling expenditure as a proportion of gross personal income, session expenditure, session duration) in a secondary analysis of Social and Economic Impact Studies of Gambling in Tasmania and the 2014 Survey on Gambling, Health and Wellbeing in the ACT. Balancing sensitivity and specificity, limits were identified for all gambling activities: EGMs (10 times per year, AUD$300/year, 0.63-1.04% of personal income, AUD$35 per session, 40 min/session), horse/dog racing (0.55% of personal income), instant scratch tickets (AUD$45/year), lotteries (0.45% of personal income), keno (4-13 times/year, AUD$45-$160/year), casino table games (AUD$345/year, 0.36-0.76% of personal income), bingo (AUD$150/year, 0.49% of personal income, AUD$17/session, 90 min/session), and sports/other event betting (14 times/year, AUD$400/year, 0.55-0.86% of personal income). These limits were exceeded by one-quarter to one-half of gamblers on these specific activities and were generally good predictors of gambling-related harm in subgroups of gamblers participating in these gambling activities and in the overall gambling sample. The limits provide gamblers, regulators, prevention workers, and researchers with simple rules of thumb in prevention efforts to reduce gambling-related harm in specific contexts.

Indexed as

GamblingAustraliaHumansIncomeRiskRisk-TakingGamblingGuidelinesHarmLimitsLow-riskResponsible gambling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.