Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34061251›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia2021

Development of a multi-patient ventilator circuit with validation in an ARDS porcine model.

Benjamin P Wankum, Riley E Reynolds, Andrea R McCain, Nathaniel T Zollinger, Keely L Buesing, Russel D Sindelar, Frank M Freihaut, Tariku Fekadu, Benjamin S Terry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benjamin P Wankum *Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of NE-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA.
Riley E ReynoldsDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of NE-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA. riley.reynolds@huskers.unl.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9022-5382
Andrea R McCainDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of NE-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA.
Nathaniel T ZollingerDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of NE-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA.
Keely L BuesingDepartment of General Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Russel D SindelarDepartment of Respiratory Care, The Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Frank M FreihautDepartment of Respiratory Care, The Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Tariku FekaduYakatit 12 Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Benjamin S TerryDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of NE-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic threatens our current ICU capabilities nationwide. As the number of COVID-19 positive patients across the nation continues to increase, the need for options to address ventilator shortages is inevitable. Multi-patient ventilation (MPV), in which more than one patient can use a single ventilator base unit, has been proposed as a potential solution to this problem. To our knowledge, this option has been discussed but remains untested in live patients with differing severity of lung pathology.

methodsThe objective of this study was to address ventilator shortages and patient stacking limitations by developing and validating a modified breathing circuit for two patients with differing lung compliances using simple, off-the-shelf components. A multi-patient ventilator circuit (MPVC) was simulated with a mathematical model and validated with four animal studies. Each animal study had two human-sized pigs: one healthy and one with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced ARDS. LPS was chosen because it lowers lung compliance similar to COVID-19. In a previous study, a control group of four pigs was given ARDS and placed on a single patient ventilation circuit (SPVC). The oxygenation of the MPVC ARDS animals was then compared to the oxygenation of the SPVC animals.

resultsBased on the comparisons, similar oxygenation and morbidity rates were observed between the MPVC ARDS animals and the SPVC animals.

conclusionAs healthcare systems worldwide deal with inundated ICUs and hospitals from pandemics, they could potentially benefit from this approach by providing more patients with respiratory care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Distress SyndromeAnimalsHumansPandemicsRespiration, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2SwineVentilators, MechanicalArtificial respirationCoronavirusCOVID-19PandemicsViruses

Identifiers

PMID34061251
PMCPMC8167306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.