Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34061249›Full record

ArticleOecologia2021

Forest management affects seasonal source-sink dynamics in a territorial, group-living bird.

Kate Layton-Matthews, Michael Griesser, Christophe F D Coste, Arpat Ozgul

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Kate Layton-MatthewsDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. kate.matthews@nina.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-1218
Michael GriesserDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christophe F D CosteCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Arpat OzgulDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

ERA-NET BiodivERsA 31BD30_172465Narodowe Centrum Nauki 665778Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (CH) PPOOP3_123520; PPOOP3_123520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistence of wildlife populations is under threat as a consequence of human activities, which are degrading natural ecosystems. Commercial forestry is the greatest threat to biodiversity in boreal forests. Forestry practices have degraded most available habitat, threatening the persistence of natural populations. Understanding population responses is, therefore, critical for their conservation. Population viability analyses are effective tools to predict population persistence under forestry management. However, quantifying the mechanisms driving population responses is complex as population dynamics vary temporally and spatially. Metapopulation dynamics are governed by local dynamics and spatial factors, potentially mediating the impacts of forestry e.g., through dispersal. Here, we performed a seasonal, spatially explicit population viability analysis, using long-term data from a group-living territorial bird (Siberian jay, Perisoreus infaustus). We quantified the effects of forest management on metapopulation dynamics, via forest type-specific demography and spatially explicit dispersal, and how forestry impacted the stability of metapopulation dynamics. Forestry reduced metapopulation growth and stability, through negative effects on reproduction and survival. Territories in higher quality natural forest contributed more to metapopulation dynamics than managed forests, largely through demographic processes rather than dispersal. Metapopulation dynamics in managed forest were also less resilient to disturbances and consequently, may be more vulnerable to environmental change. Seasonal differences in source-sink dynamics observed in managed forest, but not natural forests, were caused by associated seasonal differences in dispersal. As shown here, capturing seasonal source-sink dynamics allows us to predict population persistence under human disturbance and to provide targeted conservation recommendations.

Indexed as

EcosystemPasseriformesAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesForestryForestsHumansPopulation DynamicsSeasonsForest managementMetapopulationPerturbation analysisSpatial PVATrait-level analysis

Identifiers

PMID34061249
PMCPMC8241677
OpenAlexW3164044281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.