Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34061214›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2021

[Acute pancreatitis : Typical findings in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging].

J Wessling, U Peitz, M Hoffmann, A G Schreyer, L Grenacher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J WesslingZentrum für Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Clemenshospital, Raphaelsklinik, EVK Münster, Düesbergweg 124, 48153, Münster, Deutschland. j.wessling@alexianer.de.
U PeitzKlinik für Gastroenterologie, Pankreaszentrum, Raphaelsklinik Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
M HoffmannKlinik für Chirurgie, Pankreaszentrum, Raphaelsklinik Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
A G SchreyerInstitut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane Klinikum Brandenburg, Brandenburg, Deutschland.
L GrenacherConradia Radiologie, München, Deutschland.
Raphaelsklinik Münster · DEClemenshospital Münster · DEIhre-Radiologen · DEMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical problemImaging plays a major role to differentiate interstitial edematous from necrotic pancreatitis and to describe relevant local complications for proper patient management and decision-making in acute pancreatitis. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES: The revised Atlanta classification 2012 of acute pancreatitis divides patients into mild, moderately severe and severe groups. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are well established for diagnosis and follow-up of acute pancreatitis and its complications METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS AND ASSESSMENT: Based on the revised Atlanta classification, CT and MRI allow for adequate categorization of interstitial edematous and necrotic pancreatitis. Imaging and standardized reporting nomenclature enable confident differentiation of early and late complications in acute pancreatitis. RECOMMENDATIONS: The aim of this review article is to present an image-rich overview of different morphologic characteristics of acute pancreatitis and associated local complications by CT or MRI using case examples.

Indexed as

PancreatitisAcute DiseaseHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNecrosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcute necrotic collectionAcute peripancreatic fluid collectionComplicationsPseudocystWalled-off necrosis

Identifiers

PMID34061214
OpenAlexW3164771754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.