Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34061019›Full record

SynthesisHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2021

High-sensitivity troponin assays for early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Marie Westwood, Bram Ramaekers, Sabine Grimm, Gill Worthy, Debra Fayter, Nigel Armstrong, Titas Buksnys, Janine Ross, Manuela Joore, Jos Kleijnen

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Point of Care High-Sensitivity Troponin Assay in the Prehospital Environment.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. High-Sensitivity Troponin: Finding a Meaningful Delta.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marie WestwoodKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6257-0653
Bram RamaekersDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5785-9228
Sabine GrimmDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2175-7999
Gill WorthyKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1463-5413
Debra FayterKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4487-9216
Nigel ArmstrongKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7443-4798
Titas BuksnysKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8383-7732
Janine RossKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4763-2078
Manuela JooreDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5649-6768
Jos KleijnenKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2787-7091
Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) · GBMaastricht University · NL

Funding

Department of Health NIHR130462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is important, but only 20% of emergency admissions for chest pain will actually have an acute myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays may allow rapid rule out of myocardial infarction and avoid unnecessary hospital admissions.

objectivesTo assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for the management of adults presenting with acute chest pain, in particular for the early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction.

methodsSixteen databases were searched up to September 2019. Review methods followed published guidelines. Studies were assessed for quality using appropriate risk-of-bias tools. The bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity for meta-analyses involving four or more studies; otherwise, random-effects logistic regression was used. The health economic analysis considered the long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years associated with different troponin testing methods. The de novo model consisted of a decision tree and a state-transition cohort model. A lifetime time horizon (of 60 years) was used.

resultsThirty-seven studies (123 publications) were included in the review. The high-sensitivity cardiac troponin test strategies evaluated are defined by the combination of four factors (i.e. assay, number and timing of tests, and threshold concentration), resulting in a large number of possible combinations. Clinical opinion indicated a minimum clinically acceptable sensitivity of 97%. When considering single test strategies, only those using a threshold at or near to the limit of detection for the assay, in a sample taken at presentation, met the minimum clinically acceptable sensitivity criterion. The majority of the multiple test strategies that met this criterion comprised an initial rule-out step, based on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels in a sample taken on presentation and a minimum symptom duration, and a second stage for patients not meeting the initial rule-out criteria, based on presentation levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin and absolute change after 1, 2 or 3 hours. Two large cluster randomised controlled trials found that implementation of an early rule-out pathway for myocardial infarction reduced length of stay and rate of hospital admission without increasing cardiac events. In the base-case analysis, standard troponin testing was both the most effective and the most costly. Other testing strategies with a sensitivity of 100% (subject to uncertainty) were almost equally effective, resulting in the same life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gain at up to four decimal places. Comparisons based on the next best alternative showed that for willingness-to-pay values below £8455 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Access High Sensitivity Troponin I (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) [(symptoms > 3 hours AND < 4 ng/l at 0 hours) OR (< 5 ng/l AND Δ < 5 ng/l at 0 to 2 hours)] would be cost-effective. For thresholds between £8455 and £20,190 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Elecsys

conclusionsHigh-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing may be cost-effective compared with standard troponin testing. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019154716.

fundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionTroponinChest PainCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansQuality-Adjusted Life YearsTroponinCHEST PAINCOST–BENEFIT ANALYSISDIAGNOSTIC TESTSMYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONNSTEMITROPONIN

Identifiers

PMID34061019
PMCPMC8200931
OpenAlexW3164395561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.