SynthesisHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2021
High-sensitivity troponin assays for early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Synthesis in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case report of falsely elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I due to macro-troponin I.Practical laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: From Sarcomeric Injury Biology to Decision-Grade Risk Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical and Economic Implications of High-Sensitivity Troponin-Informed Admission Strategies in Non-AMI Chest Pain.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- A Wearable Infrared Sensor for Detecting Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CBC-Derived Inflammatory Indices and Myocardial Injury Severity at Presentation in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Association and Discriminative Performance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Efficacy of CPS, HEART and TIMI Score in Emergency Department Patients with Non-Traumatic Chest Pain: A Pilot Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Social Isolation and Incidence of Chest Pain and Mortality in Older Adults of the United States Population: A Cross-Sectional Study From NHANES 2001-2018.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Point of Care High-Sensitivity Troponin Assay in the Prehospital Environment.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Observational
- Application of Continuous Improvement of Pre-Examination Process Based on Evidence-Based Nursing Concept in Acute Chest Pain of Adults.Emergency medicine international · 2026Article
- Molecular Organ Lysate Imprinting: For Precision Recognition and Analysis of Organ-Derived Proteins.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2025Article
- Adequately identifying low-risk chest pain in emergency primary care: evaluating the performance of preHEAR(T) based on two European cohorts.Open heart · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical Outcomes, Healthcare Utilization, and Cost Following Implementation of a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assay.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
- DNA origami signal amplification in lateral flow immunoassays.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Clinical derivation and data simulated validation of rule-out and rule-in algorithms for the Siemens Atellica IM high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Enhanced Chemiluminescence Vertical Flow Assay for High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Testing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Critical Challenges in Cancer Immunotherapy and Cardiac Health.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Review
- Rapid diagnosis of different cardiovascular disease events from early released cardiac biomarkers, cTnI, BNP, and CRP, by biosensor technology.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- High-Sensitivity Troponin: Finding a Meaningful Delta.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- A cloud-based medical device for predicting cardiac risk in suspected coronary artery disease: a rapid review and conceptual economic model.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is important, but only 20% of emergency admissions for chest pain will actually have an acute myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays may allow rapid rule out of myocardial infarction and avoid unnecessary hospital admissions.
objectivesTo assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for the management of adults presenting with acute chest pain, in particular for the early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction.
methodsSixteen databases were searched up to September 2019. Review methods followed published guidelines. Studies were assessed for quality using appropriate risk-of-bias tools. The bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity for meta-analyses involving four or more studies; otherwise, random-effects logistic regression was used. The health economic analysis considered the long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years associated with different troponin testing methods. The de novo model consisted of a decision tree and a state-transition cohort model. A lifetime time horizon (of 60 years) was used.
resultsThirty-seven studies (123 publications) were included in the review. The high-sensitivity cardiac troponin test strategies evaluated are defined by the combination of four factors (i.e. assay, number and timing of tests, and threshold concentration), resulting in a large number of possible combinations. Clinical opinion indicated a minimum clinically acceptable sensitivity of 97%. When considering single test strategies, only those using a threshold at or near to the limit of detection for the assay, in a sample taken at presentation, met the minimum clinically acceptable sensitivity criterion. The majority of the multiple test strategies that met this criterion comprised an initial rule-out step, based on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels in a sample taken on presentation and a minimum symptom duration, and a second stage for patients not meeting the initial rule-out criteria, based on presentation levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin and absolute change after 1, 2 or 3 hours. Two large cluster randomised controlled trials found that implementation of an early rule-out pathway for myocardial infarction reduced length of stay and rate of hospital admission without increasing cardiac events. In the base-case analysis, standard troponin testing was both the most effective and the most costly. Other testing strategies with a sensitivity of 100% (subject to uncertainty) were almost equally effective, resulting in the same life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gain at up to four decimal places. Comparisons based on the next best alternative showed that for willingness-to-pay values below £8455 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Access High Sensitivity Troponin I (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) [(symptoms > 3 hours AND < 4 ng/l at 0 hours) OR (< 5 ng/l AND Δ < 5 ng/l at 0 to 2 hours)] would be cost-effective. For thresholds between £8455 and £20,190 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Elecsys
conclusionsHigh-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing may be cost-effective compared with standard troponin testing. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019154716.
fundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.