Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34060885›Full record

ArticleThe American psychologist2022

The polarized mind in context: Interdisciplinary approaches to the psychology of political polarization.

Jeroen M van Baar, Oriel FeldmanHall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American psychologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Interbrain Synchrony Mitigates Extremism Within Echo Chambers.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Intolerance of uncertainty modulates brain-to-brain synchrony during politically polarized perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeroen M van BaarDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences.ORCID 0000-0001-8567-7931
Oriel FeldmanHallDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences.ORCID 0000-0002-0726-3861

Funding

The neural basis of sequential control in human and non-human primatesP20GM103645 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, JEROME N · 2013 to 2022
$22.9M
National Institutes of Health; National Institute of General MedicineNIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing research into the psychological roots of political polarization centers around two main approaches: one studying cognitive traits that predict susceptibility to holding polarized beliefs and one studying contextual influences that spread and reinforce polarized attitudes. Although both accounts have made valuable progress, political polarization is neither a purely cognitive trait nor a contextual issue. We argue that a new approach aiming to uncover interactions between cognition and context will be fruitful for understanding how polarization arises. Furthermore, recent developments in neuroimaging methods can overcome long-standing issues of measurement and ecological validity to critically help identify in which psychological processing steps-e.g., attention, semantic understanding, emotion-polarization takes hold. This interdisciplinary research agenda can thereby provide new avenues for interventions against the political polarization that plagues democracies around the world. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AttitudePoliticsCognitionEmotionsInterdisciplinary Studies

Identifiers

PMID34060885
PMCPMC8630091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.