Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34060705›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives' Survey within Seven Countries.

Dagny Faksvåg Haugen, Karl Ove Hufthammer, Christina Gerlach, Katrin Sigurdardottir, Marit Irene Tuen Hansen, Grace Ting, Vilma Adriana Tripodoro, Gabriel Goldraij, Eduardo Garcia Yanneo, Wojciech Leppert and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03566732 (International Care Of the Dying Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03566732 completednot on this map

International Care Of the Dying Evaluation (CODE): Quality of Care for Cancer Patients as Perceived by Bereaved Relatives

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2017 to 2018Enrolled914ConditionsNeoplasms, Bereavement, Quality of Life
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cancer care at the end of life: system-wide expenditure in a national health service.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prognostication of the Last Days of Life.Cancer research and treatment · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Dagny Faksvåg HaugenDepartment of Clinical Medicine (K1), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8592-4995
Karl Ove HufthammerCentre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-9496
Christina GerlachInterdisciplinary Palliative Care Unit, III. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2182-9427
Katrin SigurdardottirRegional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8192-7470
Marit Irene Tuen HansenDepartment of Clinical Medicine (K1), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Grace TingAcademic Palliative and End-of-Life Care Department, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool.
Vilma Adriana TripodoroPallium Latinoamérica, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-2328-6032
Gabriel GoldraijHospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-6665-6550
Eduardo Garcia YanneoMutualista Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Wojciech LeppertDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0852-2535
Katarzyna WolszczakSue Ryder House, Pallmed, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Lair ZambonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Campinas State University, Campinas, Brazil.
Juliana Nalin PassariniSumaré State Hospital, Campinas, Brazil.
Ivete Alonso Bredda SaadSumaré State Hospital, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1239-4724
Martin WeberInterdisciplinary Palliative Care Unit, III. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
John EllershawAcademic Palliative and End-of-Life Care Department, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool.ORCID 0000-0001-9789-3180
Catriona Rachel MaylandAcademic Palliative and End-of-Life Care Department, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool.ORCID 0000-0002-1440-9953
ERANet-LAC CODE Project Group
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Liverpool · GBFaculdade Sumaré · BRJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEHospital Privado · ARMutualista Hospital Evangélico · UYNZOZ Dom Sue Ryder · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversidad de Buenos Aires · ARUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecognized disparities in quality of end-of-life care exist. Our aim was to assess the quality of care for patients dying from cancer, as perceived by bereaved relatives, within hospitals in seven European and South American countries. MATERIALS AND

methodsA postbereavement survey was conducted by post, interview, or via tablet in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, U.K., Germany, Norway, and Poland. Next of kin to cancer patients were asked to complete the international version of the Care Of the Dying Evaluation (i-CODE) questionnaire 6-8 weeks postbereavement. Primary outcomes were (a) how frequently the deceased patient was treated with dignity and respect, and (b) how well the family member was supported in the patient's last days of life.

resultsOf 1,683 potential participants, 914 i-CODE questionnaires were completed (response rate, 54%). Approximately 94% reported the doctors treated their family member with dignity and respect "always" or "most of the time"; similar responses were given about nursing staff (94%). Additionally, 89% of participants reported they were adequately supported; this was more likely if the patient died on a specialist palliative care unit (odds ratio, 6.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-17.8). Although 87% of participants were told their relative was likely to die, only 63% were informed about what to expect during the dying phase.

conclusionThis is the first study assessing quality of care for dying cancer patients from the bereaved relatives' perspective across several countries on two continents. Our findings suggest many elements of good care were practiced but improvement in communication with relatives of imminently dying patients is needed. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03566732). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Previous studies have shown that bereaved relatives' views represent a valid way to assess care for dying patients in the last days of their life. The Care Of the Dying Evaluation questionnaire is a suitable tool for quality improvement work to help determine areas where care is perceived well and areas where care is perceived as lacking. Health care professionals need to sustain high quality communication into the last phase of the cancer trajectory. In particular, discussions about what to expect when someone is dying and the provision of hydration in the last days of life represent key areas for improvement.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsTerminal CareBrazilFamilyGermanyHospitalsHumansPalliative CareQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesBereaved relativesPalliative careProxyQuality of health careSurvey and questionnaireTerminal care

Identifiers

PMID34060705
PMCPMC8265351
OpenAlexW3165523677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.