ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2021
A time-resolved experimental-mathematical model for predicting the response of glioma cells to single-dose radiation therapy.
Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Forecasting Chemoradiation Response Midtreatment for High-Grade Gliomas Through Patient-Specific Biology-Based Modeling.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Article
- A data assimilation framework for predicting the spatiotemporal response of high-grade gliomas to chemoradiation.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Quantitative Method for Monitoring Tumor Evolution During and After Therapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- The temporal response of a glioma cell population to irradiation: modelling the effect of dose and cell density.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- A mathematical model for predicting the spatiotemporal response of breast cancer cells treated with doxorubicin.Cancer biology & therapy · 2024Article
- Characterising Cancer Cell Responses to Cyclic Hypoxia Using Mathematical Modelling.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2024Article
- Simulating tumor volume dynamics in response to radiotherapy: Implications of model selection.Journal of theoretical biology · 2024Article
- A practical guide for the generation of model-based virtual clinical trials.Frontiers in systems biology · 2023Article
- A data assimilation framework to predict the response of glioma cells to radiation.Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE · 2023Article
- Towards integration of time-resolved confocal microscopy of a 3D in vitro microfluidic platform with a hybrid multiscale model of tumor angiogenesis.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Opportunities for improving brain cancer treatment outcomes through imaging-based mathematical modeling of the delivery of radiotherapy and immunotherapy.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- Combining Mechanisms of Growth Arrest in Solid Tumours: A Mathematical Investigation.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2022Article
- Mathematical modeling of radiotherapy and its impact on tumor interactions with the immune system.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Review
- Integrating mechanism-based modeling with biomedical imaging to build practical digital twins for clinical oncology.Biophysics reviews · 2022Review
- Modelling glioma progression, mass effect and intracranial pressure in patient anatomy.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- A Multi-Compartment Model of Glioma Response to Fractionated Radiation Therapy ParameterizedFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Radiotherapy of High-Grade Gliomas: First Half of 2021 Update with Special Reference to Radiosensitization Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and validate a mechanism-based, mathematical model that characterizes 9L and C6 glioma cells' temporal response to single-dose radiation therapy in vitro by explicitly incorporating time-dependent biological interactions with radiation.
methodsWe employed time-resolved microscopy to track the confluence of 9L and C6 glioma cells receiving radiation doses of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 or 16 Gy. DNA repair kinetics are measured by γH2AX expression via flow cytometry. The microscopy data (814 replicates for 9L, 540 replicates for C6 at various seeding densities receiving doses above) were divided into training (75%) and validation (25%) sets. A mechanistic model was developed, and model parameters were calibrated to the training data. The model was then used to predict the temporal dynamics of the validation set given the known initial confluences and doses. The predictions were compared to the corresponding dynamic microscopy data.
resultsFor 9L, we obtained an average (± standard deviation, SD) Pearson correlation coefficient between the predicted and measured confluence of 0.87 ± 0.16, and an average (±SD) concordance correlation coefficient of 0.72 ± 0.28. For C6, we obtained an average (±SD) Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.90 ± 0.17, and an average (±SD) concordance correlation coefficient of 0.71 ± 0.24.
conclusionThe proposed model can effectively predict the temporal development of 9L and C6 glioma cells in response to a range of single-fraction radiation doses. By developing a mechanism-based, mathematical model that can be populated with time-resolved data, we provide an experimental-mathematical framework that allows for quantitative investigation of cells' temporal response to radiation. Our approach provides two key advances: (i) a time-resolved, dynamic death rate with a clear biological interpretation, and (ii) accurate predictions over a wide range of cell seeding densities and radiation doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.