Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34060439›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2021

Expectations, values, preferences and experiences of Hungarian primary care population when accessing services: Evaluation of the patient's questionnaires of the international QUALICOPC study.

Anna Nánási, Tímea Ungvári, László R Kolozsvári, Szilvia Harsányi, Zoltán Jancsó, Levente I Lánczi, Lajos Mester, Csaba Móczár, Csilla Semanova, Péter Schmidt and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna NánásiDepartment of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1346-1995
Tímea UngváriDepartment of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
László R KolozsváriDepartment of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Szilvia HarsányiDepartment of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Zoltán JancsóDepartment of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Levente I LáncziDepartment of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Lajos MesterInstitute of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Csaba MóczárIrinyi Primary Care Health Center, Kecskemét, Hungary.
Csilla SemanovaDepartment of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Péter SchmidtDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Judit SzidorDepartment of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Péter TorzsaDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Mária VéghInstitute of Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Imre RurikDepartment of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
University of Debrecen · HUSemmelweis University · HUUniversity of Pecs · HUUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreferences and wishes of patients is an important indicator of primary health care provision, although there are differences between national primary care systems.

aimThe aim of this paper is to describe and evaluate the preferences and values of Hungarian primary care (PC) patients before accessing and to analyse their experiences after attending PC services.

methodsIn the Hungarian arm of the European QUALICOPC Study, in 2013-2014, information was collected with questionnaires; the Patient Values contained 19 and the Patient Experiences had 41 multiple-choice questions.

findingsThe questionnaires were filled by 2149 (840 men, 1309 women) using PC services, aged 49.1 (SD ± 16.7) years, 73% of them having chronic morbidities. Women preferred to be accompanied and rated their own health better. Patients in the lowest educational category and women visited their GPs more often, and they are consulted more frequently by other doctors as well. Men, older and secondary educated people reported more frequently chronic morbidities. Longer opening hours were preferred by patients with higher education. The most preferred expectations were availability and polite communication of doctors, not pressures on consultation time, clear instructions provided during consultations, shared decisions about treatments and options for consultations, the knowledge of the doctors concerning the living conditions, social and cultural backgrounds of patients, updated medical records, short waiting times, options for home visits, wide scope of professional competences and trust in the doctor.

conclusionWishes, preferences of patients and fulfilment were similar than described in other participating countries of the study. Although there are room to improve PC services, most of the questioned population were satisfied with the provision.

Indexed as

MotivationPrimary Health CareCommunicationFemaleHumansHungaryMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesadherenceexpectationsHungarypreferencesprimary careQUALICOPC

Identifiers

PMID34060439
PMCPMC8220346
OpenAlexW3165804706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.