Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34060254›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2021

Exploring the Role of Antinuclear Antibody Positivity in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Health Outcomes of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Sujaytha S Paknikar, Cynthia S Crowson, John M Davis, Uma Thanarajasingam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sujaytha S PaknikarMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8903-6285
Cynthia S CrowsonMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-7475
John M DavisMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9710-8143
Uma ThanarajasingamMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4197-4907
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

HEART DISEASE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISR01AR046849 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CROWSON, CYNTHIA S · 2000 to 2022
$11.3M
Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR01AG034676 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A, ST SAUVER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2010 to 2019
$9.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR046849NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR46849NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034676NIH HHS R01AG034676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to describe differences in the clinical course of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive compared with those who are ANA-negative.

methodsThis was a retrospective population-based cohort study of residents in Olmsted County, Minnesota, who first fulfilled 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA in 2009-2014. Data were collected on first documentation of joint swelling. Data on rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody testing and the ANA level were also collected. Comparisons between groups were performed by using χ

resultsIn this cohort, 64% of patients were tested for ANA within ±90 days of RA criteria fulfillment. In the161 patients with ANA testing, 25% were ANA-positive. Patients who were ANA-positive were younger, female, and less likely to be current smokers. ANA positivity did not differ between patients with RA who were seropositive and seronegative. In seropositive patients who were ANA-positive, there was an increased time to fulfillment of RA criteria, increased time to treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and increased likelihood of being treated with hydroxychloroquine as opposed to methotrexate. Other outcomes, including disease activity and mortality, did not differ significantly between groups.

conclusionIn patients with RA, important differences exist between those who are ANA-positive and ANA-negative in terms of time to fulfillment of RA criteria and time to DMARD initiation as well as choice of initial pharmacotherapy. These findings could indicate a difference in clinical presentation or perception of patients with RA who are ANA-positive. Further research is needed to study the long-term outcomes of patients with RA who are ANA-positive.

Identifiers

PMID34060254
PMCPMC8207683
OpenAlexW3165869747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.