ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Assessing the accuracy and educational value of YouTube videos on a novel regional anesthesia technique (PENG block).PloS one · 2026Article
- Educational Quality and Reliability of YouTube Content Related to Musculoskeletal Ultrasound.Archives of rheumatology · 2025Article
- YouTube Videos on Lateral Epicondylitis Often Lack High-Quality, Reliable Information.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence solutions for temporomandibular joint disorders: Contributions and future potential of ChatGPT.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
- Assessment of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos related to teleradiology in musculoskeletal and rheumatic diseases: a cross-sectional study.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessment of quality and reliability of YouTube videos for patient and physician education on inflammatory myositis.Clinical rheumatology · 2023Article
- Assessment of quality and reliability of YouTube videos for patient and physician education on inflammatory myositis.Clinical rheumatology · 2023Article
- Assessment of Reliability and Quality of Videos on Medial Epicondylitis Shared on YouTube.Cureus · 2023Article
- The Evaluation of YouTube™ English Videos' Quality About Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2023Article
- Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Intragastric Balloon Videos on YouTube.Obesity surgery · 2022Article
- Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Video Content about Perianal Fistulas.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- YouTube videos as a source of information concerning Behçet's disease: a reliability and quality analysis.Rheumatology international · 2021Article
- YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 vaccination in rheumatic diseases.Rheumatology international · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
objectivesA progressively growing number of rheumatologists have integrated musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) as a prized tool in their daily clinical practice over the past two decades. Lately, YouTube is often used by healthcare professionals as an educational tool. This study aimed to analyze the quality of educational information available on YouTube pertaining to MSUS.
methodWe performed a search using the keyword "musculoskeletal ultrasound" on YouTube in January 2021. Of the first 200 videos screened, 147 met the inclusion criteria. The quality and reliability of the videos were evaluated using the global quality score (GQS) and modified DISCERN score, and their popularity was assessed using the Video Power Index (VPI).
resultsOf the 147 videos evaluated, 58 (39.5%) were of high quality, 30 (20.4%) were of moderate quality, while 59 (40.1%) were of low quality. The modified DISCERN score and the duration of the videos were significantly higher in the high-quality videos than the moderate- and low-quality videos (p < 0.001 for all). The median number of views per day, likes, comments, and the popularity of the videos assessed with VPI were significantly higher in the high- and moderate-quality group compared to the low-quality videos (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.007, and p < 0.001, respectively).
conclusionThe quality of YouTube videos as an educational source on MSUS is unsatisfactory. Professional organizations and physicians should consider creating more high-quality MSUS videos. YouTube should consider filtering out poor-quality videos in collaboration with experts in the field. Key Points • Although rheumatologists are increasingly using ultrasound as an extension of their exam, accessing musculoskeletal ultrasound training is still facing some challenges. • YouTube is commonly used as an educational source by medical students and healthcare professionals. • Approximately 60% of the videos related to musculoskeletal ultrasound on YouTube revealed high and moderate quality, while the remaining 40% were of low quality and not suitable for medical education. • A filtering mechanism is required to improve the quality of YouTube content on MSUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.