Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34059935›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2021

Motor evoked potential latency and duration from tibialis anterior in individuals with chronic stroke.

Brice T Cleland, Emily Sisel, Sangeetha Madhavan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Corticospinal Responses Following Gait-Specific Training in Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brice T ClelandBrain Plasticity Lab, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8227-6876
Emily SiselCollege of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7215-811X
Sangeetha MadhavanBrain Plasticity Lab, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. smadhava@uic.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6086-0027
University of Illinois Chicago · USIllinois College · US

Funding

Cortical priming to optimize gait rehabilitation post strokeR01HD075777 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MADHAVAN, SANGEETHA · 2014 to 2024
$4.1M
Contribution of the non-lesioned hemisphere to lower limb movement and walking function after strokeF32HD102214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CLELAND, BRICE THOMAS · 2020 to 2022
$206k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD075777NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD102214NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075777NIH HHS F32HD102214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ipsilateral motor pathways from the contralesional hemisphere to the paretic limbs may be upregulated to compensate for impaired function after stroke. Onset latency and duration of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provide insight into compensatory pathways but have been understudied in the lower limb. This study assessed MEP onset latency and duration in the lower limb after stroke, and compared ipsilateral and contralateral MEPs in the paretic and non-paretic limb. We hypothesized that: (1) onset latency would be longer for ipsilateral than contralateral MEPs and longer for the paretic than the non-paretic limb, and (2) duration would be shorter for ipsilateral than contralateral MEPs and longer for the paretic than the non-paretic limb. Data were collected as a part of a pre-test of a randomized controlled trial. TMS was applied to the ipsilateral and contralateral hemisphere of the paretic and non-paretic limb. MEP onset latency and duration were calculated from the tibialis anterior. Thirty-five participants with chronic stroke were included in the final analysis. Onset latency was longer in the paretic than the non-paretic limb (~ 6.0 ms) and longer after ipsilateral than contralateral stimulation (~ 1.8 ms). Duration was longer in the paretic than the non-paretic limb (~ 9.2 ms) and longer after contralateral than ipsilateral stimulation (~ 5.2 ms). Ipsilateral MEPs may be elicited through ipsilateral pathways with fewer fibers with a higher activation threshold and/or greater spinal branching. MEPs from the paretic limb may reflect slower central motor conduction, peripheral changes, or changes in motor pathway.

Indexed as

Motor CortexStrokeElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorHumansMuscle, SkeletalTranscranial Magnetic StimulationLower extremityNeural pathwaysStroke rehabilitationTMS

Identifiers

PMID34059935
PMCPMC8369391
OpenAlexW3163951510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.