Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34059743›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Neural networks for increased accuracy of allergenic pollen monitoring.

Marcel Polling, Chen Li, Lu Cao, Fons Verbeek, Letty A de Weger, Jordina Belmonte, Concepción De Linares, Joost Willemse, Hugo de Boer, Barbara Gravendeel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Detecting Airborne Pollen Using an Automatic, Real-Time Monitoring System: Evidence from Two Sites.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcel Polling *Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. marcel.polling@naturalis.nl.
Chen Li *Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (LIACS), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lu CaoLeiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (LIACS), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Fons VerbeekLeiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (LIACS), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Letty A de WegerDepartment of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jordina BelmonteInstitute of Environmental Sciences and Technology (ICTA-UAB), The Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Concepción De LinaresInstitute of Environmental Sciences and Technology (ICTA-UAB), The Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Joost WillemseMicrobial Sciences, Institute of Biology, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hugo de BoerNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Barbara GravendeelNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Naturalis Biodiversity Center · NLUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring of airborne pollen concentrations provides an important source of information for the globally increasing number of hay fever patients. Airborne pollen is traditionally counted under the microscope, but with the latest developments in image recognition methods, automating this process has become feasible. A challenge that persists, however, is that many pollen grains cannot be distinguished beyond the genus or family level using a microscope. Here, we assess the use of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to increase taxonomic accuracy for airborne pollen. As a case study we use the nettle family (Urticaceae), which contains two main genera (Urtica and Parietaria) common in European landscapes which pollen cannot be separated by trained specialists. While pollen from Urtica species has very low allergenic relevance, pollen from several species of Parietaria is severely allergenic. We collect pollen from both fresh as well as from herbarium specimens and use these without the often used acetolysis step to train the CNN model. The models show that unacetolyzed Urticaceae pollen grains can be distinguished with > 98% accuracy. We then apply our model on before unseen Urticaceae pollen collected from aerobiological samples and show that the genera can be confidently distinguished, despite the more challenging input images that are often overlain by debris. Our method can also be applied to other pollen families in the future and will thus help to make allergenic pollen monitoring more specific.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAllergensEnvironmental MonitoringParietariaPollenSeasonsAllergens

Identifiers

PMID34059743
PMCPMC8166864
OpenAlexW3164125082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.