Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34059703›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A three-dimensional musculoskeletal model of the dog.

Heiko Stark, Martin S Fischer, Alexander Hunt, Fletcher Young, Roger Quinn, Emanuel Andrada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. From fibre to function: are we accurately representing muscle architecture and performance?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Validation of an Echidna Forelimb Musculoskeletal Model Using XROMM and diceCT.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  16. A Whole-Body Musculoskeletal Model of the Mouse.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heiko StarkInstitute of Zoology and Evolutionary Research with Phyletic Museum, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany. heiko@starkrats.de.
Martin S FischerInstitute of Zoology and Evolutionary Research with Phyletic Museum, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Alexander HuntDepartment of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, USA.
Fletcher YoungDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.
Roger QuinnDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.
Emanuel AndradaInstitute of Zoology and Evolutionary Research with Phyletic Museum, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domestic dog is interesting to investigate because of the wide range of body size, body mass, and physique in the many breeds. In the last several years, the number of clinical and biomechanical studies on dog locomotion has increased. However, the relationship between body structure and joint load during locomotion, as well as between joint load and degenerative diseases of the locomotor system (e.g. dysplasia), are not sufficiently understood. Collecting this data through in vivo measurements/records of joint forces and loads on deep/small muscles is complex, invasive, and sometimes unethical. The use of detailed musculoskeletal models may help fill the knowledge gap. We describe here the methods we used to create a detailed musculoskeletal model with 84 degrees of freedom and 134 muscles. Our model has three key-features: three-dimensionality, scalability, and modularity. We tested the validity of the model by identifying forelimb muscle synergies of a walking Beagle. We used inverse dynamics and static optimization to estimate muscle activations based on experimental data. We identified three muscle synergy groups by using hierarchical clustering. The activation patterns predicted from the model exhibit good agreement with experimental data for most of the forelimb muscles. We expect that our model will speed up the analysis of how body size, physique, agility, and disease influence neuronal control and joint loading in dog locomotion.

Identifiers

PMID34059703
PMCPMC8166944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.