Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34059523›Full record

ArticleRMD open2021

New risk model is able to identify patients with a low risk of progression in systemic sclerosis.

Nina Marijn van Leeuwen, Marc Maurits, Sophie Liem, Jacopo Ciaffi, Nina Ajmone Marsan, Maarten Ninaber, Cornelia Allaart, Henrike Gillet van Dongen, Robbert Goekoop, Tom Huizinga and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nina Marijn van Leeuwen *Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands n.m.van_leeuwen@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4228-012X
Marc Maurits *Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sophie LiemDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jacopo CiaffiMedicine and Rheumatology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Nina Ajmone MarsanCardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Maarten NinaberPulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cornelia AllaartDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Henrike Gillet van DongenDepartment of Rheumatology, Medisch Centrum Haaglanden, Den Haag, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Robbert GoekoopRheumatology, HagaZiekenhuis, The Hague, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Tom HuizingaDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7033-7520
Rachel KnevelRheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7494-3023
Jeska De Vries-BouwstraDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHaga Hospital · NLIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a prediction model to guide annual assessment of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients tailored in accordance to disease activity.

methodsA machine learning approach was used to develop a model that can identify patients without disease progression. SSc patients included in the prospective Leiden SSc cohort and fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria were included. Disease progression was defined as progression in ≥1 organ system, and/or start of immunosuppression or death. Using elastic-net-regularisation, and including 90 independent clinical variables (100% complete), we trained the model on 75% and validated it on 25% of the patients, optimising on negative predictive value (NPV) to minimise the likelihood of missing progression. Probability cutoffs were identified for low and high risk for disease progression by expert assessment.

resultsOf the 492 SSc patients (follow-up range: 2-10 years), disease progression during follow-up was observed in 52% (median time 4.9 years). Performance of the model in the test set showed an AUC-ROC of 0.66. Probability score cutoffs were defined: low risk for disease progression (<0.197, NPV:1.0; 29% of patients), intermediate risk (0.197-0.223, NPV:0.82; 27%) and high risk (>0.223, NPV:0.78; 44%). The relevant variables for the model were: previous use of cyclophosphamide or corticosteroids, start with immunosuppressive drugs, previous gastrointestinal progression, previous cardiovascular event, pulmonary arterial hypertension, modified Rodnan Skin Score, creatine kinase and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide.

conclusionOur machine-learning-assisted model for progression enabled us to classify 29% of SSc patients as 'low risk'. In this group, annual assessment programmes could be less extensive than indicated by international guidelines.

Indexed as

Scleroderma, SystemicCohort StudiesHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsProspective StudiesSkinImmunosuppressive Agentsautoimmunityhealth careoutcome assessmentsclerodermasystemic

Identifiers

PMID34059523
PMCPMC8169494
OpenAlexW3165647618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.