Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34059517›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital settings: a scoping review protocol.

Adel Alabdaly, Deborah Debono, Reece Hinchcliff, Su-Yin Hor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adel AlabdalyFaculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia A.Alabdaly@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0914-5225
Deborah DebonoCentre for Health Services Management, School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2095-156X
Reece HinchcliffCentre for Health Services Management, School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9920-4211
Su-Yin HorCentre for Health Services Management, School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6498-9722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHospitals commonly examine patient safety culture and other quality indicators to evaluate and improve performance in relation to quality and safety. A growing body of research has separately examined relationships between patient safety culture and patient experience on clinical outcomes and other quality indicators. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding the relationship between these two important domains. This article describes the protocol for a scoping review of published literature examining the relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital settings. The scoping review will provide an overview of research into the relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital contexts, map key concepts underpinning these domains and identify research gaps for further study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scoping review will be conducted using the five stages of Arksey and O'Malley's framework: identify the research question; identify relevant studies; study selection; chart data; and collate, summarise and report the results. The inclusion criteria will be applied using the Population, Concept and Context Framework. Searches will be conducted in the CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus and SciELO databases, without applying date range limits. Hand-searching of grey literature will also be performed to find relevant, non-indexed literature. Data will be extracted using a standardised data extraction form developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Both descriptive and thematic analyses will be undertaken to scope key concepts within the body of reviewed literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This type of study does not require an ethics review. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyResearch DesignHospitalsHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentSafety ManagementScoping Reviews as Topichealth & safetyhealth services administration & managementquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID34059517
PMCPMC8169466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.