Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34059509›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Intrapartum interventions and outcomes for women and children following induction of labour at term in uncomplicated pregnancies: a 16-year population-based linked data study.

Hannah G Dahlen, Charlene Thornton, Soo Downe, Ank de Jonge, Anna Seijmonsbergen-Schermers, Sally Tracy, Mark Tracy, Andrew Bisits, Lilian Peters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Authentic Consumer-Clinician Co-Design of a Labour and Childbirth Intervention to Optimise Maternal Hydration in Labour: Reaching Consensus to Enhance Rigour.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Hannah G DahlenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia H.Dahlen@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4450-3078
Charlene ThorntonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia.
Soo DowneSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia.
Ank de JongeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia.
Anna Seijmonsbergen-SchermersMidwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5946-2205
Sally TracySchool of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark TracyWestmead Newborn Intensive Care Unit, The University of Sydney Paediatrics and ChildHealth and WSLHD, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew BisitsSchool of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Lilian PetersSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUWestern Sydney University · AUFlinders University · AUUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Lancashire · GBUNSW Sydney · AUVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe compared intrapartum interventions and outcomes for mothers, neonates and children up to 16 years, for induction of labour (IOL) versus spontaneous labour onset in uncomplicated term pregnancies with live births.

designWe used population linked data from New South Wales, Australia (2001-2016) for healthy women giving birth at 37+0 to 41+6 weeks. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed for intrapartum interventions, postnatal maternal and neonatal outcomes, and long-term child outcomes adjusted for maternal age, country of birth, socioeconomic status, parity and gestational age.

resultsOf 474 652 included births, 69 397 (15%) had an IOL for non-medical reasons. Primiparous women with IOL versus spontaneous onset differed significantly for: spontaneous vaginal birth (42.7% vs 62.3%), instrumental birth (28.0% vs 23.9%%), intrapartum caesarean section (29.3% vs 13.8%), epidural (71.0% vs 41.3%), episiotomy (41.2% vs 30.5%) and postpartum haemorrhage (2.4% vs 1.5%). There was a similar trend in outcomes for multiparous women, except for caesarean section which was lower (5.3% vs 6.2%). For both groups, third and fourth degree perineal tears were lower overall in the IOL group: primiparous women (4.2% vs 4.9%), multiparous women (0.7% vs 1.2%), though overall vaginal repair was higher (89.3% vs 84.3%). Following induction, incidences of neonatal birth trauma, resuscitation and respiratory disorders were higher, as were admissions to hospital for infections (ear, nose, throat, respiratory and sepsis) up to 16 years. There was no difference in hospitalisation for asthma or eczema, or for neonatal death (0.06% vs 0.08%), or in total deaths up to 16 years.

conclusionIOL for non-medical reasons was associated with higher birth interventions, particularly in primiparous women, and more adverse maternal, neonatal and child outcomes for most variables assessed. The size of effect varied by parity and gestational age, making these important considerations when informing women about the risks and benefits of IOL.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionSemantic WebAustraliaChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLabor, InducedNew South WalesParturitionPregnancyepidemiologymaternal medicineneonatologyobstetrics

Identifiers

PMID34059509
PMCPMC8169493
OpenAlexW3164379958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.