Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34059480›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical education

Overcoming the Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Mentorship: A Scoping Review of Long-distance Mentorship in Surgery.

Layne N Raborn, Jeffrey E Janis

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical education. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enhancing outcomes and accelerating learning curves in open pyeloplasty.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  2. International Mentorship and Lifelong Learning in Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. What Do Undergraduate Medical Students Value in Plastic Surgery Conferences?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Results of a Pilot Virtual Microsurgery Course for Plastic Surgeons in LMICs.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Prevention and Treatment of Burn Scar Contracture: A Practical Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Workplace Bias Affecting Applicants to Independent Plastic Surgery Residencies.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Layne N RabornLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Jeffrey E JanisDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center Columbus, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: jeffrey.janis@osumc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMentorship in the surgical field has been increasingly recognized as a crucial component of career success. Distance mentorship models may be utilized to overcome geographic limitations, increase mentorship access, and strengthen mentoring relationships in surgery.

objectiveThis review aimed to identify the scope of literature on distance mentoring in surgery, the range of its application, its effectiveness, and any gaps in the literature that should be addressed in order to enhance mentorship in the surgical field.

designA comprehensive PubMed review was performed in January 2021 on distance mentorship of students, trainees, and surgeons in the surgical field. Reviews, replies, and non-English articles were excluded. Data was extracted regarding publication year, author's country, specialty, subjects, aim of mentorship model, and efficacy.

results134 total studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most studies were published in 2020, written by authors in the United States, from general surgery, and featured an expert surgeon paired with a more junior fully trained surgeon. In all, 93.3% of studies utilized distance mentorship to enhance surgical skill through telementoring and only 4.5% were focused on mentorship to enhance careers through professional development. The remaining studies utilized distance mentorship models to increase surgical research (0.7%) and clinical knowledge (1.5%).

conclusionThe results of this review suggest successful implementation of distance mentoring in surgery through telementoring, but a lack of professionally aimed distance mentorship programs. Amidst COVID-19, distance mentorship is particularly important because of decreased face-to-face opportunity. Future studies in the surgical field should investigate distance mentoring as a means of increasing mentorship for professional development.

Indexed as

COVID-19MentoringHumansMentorsSARS-CoV-2StudentsUnited Stateseducatione-mentorremotetelementortrainingvirtual

Identifiers

PMID34059480
PMCPMC8894132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.