Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34059094›Full record

Trial reportJournal of translational medicine2021

NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma.

Vilde Drageset Haakensen, Anna K Nowak, Espen Basmo Ellingsen, Saima Jamil Farooqi, Maria Moksnes Bjaanæs, Henrik Horndalsveen, Tine Mcculloch, Oscar Grundberg, Susana M Cedres, Åslaug Helland

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04300244 (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab +/- UV1 Vaccination as Second Line Treatment in Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04300244 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab +/- UV1 Vaccination as Second Line Treatment in Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma (the NIPU-study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorÅslaug HellandRan2020 to 2027Enrolled118ConditionsCancer, Cancer, Lung, Cancer of Lung, MesotheliomaArmsUV1 vaccine + leukine, ipilimumab, nivolumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Novel and Future Treatment Options in Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Dual-time-point [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. [Research Progress of Lung Cancer Vaccines].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2023
    Review
  19. Clinical Activity of Combined Telomerase Vaccination and Pembrolizumab in Advanced Melanoma: Results from a Phase I Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Vilde Drageset HaakensenDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anna K NowakNational Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, Institute for Respiratory Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Espen Basmo EllingsenDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Saima Jamil FarooqiDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Maria Moksnes BjaanæsDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Henrik HorndalsveenDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tine MccullochDepartment of Oncology and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Oscar GrundbergThoracic Oncology Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Susana M CedresOncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Åslaug HellandDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. aslaug.helland@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0002-5520-0275
Oslo University Hospital · NOAalborg University Hospital · DKKarolinska University Hospital · SEThe University of Western Australia · AUVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive tumour. For patients with inoperable disease, few treatment options are available after first line chemotherapy. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has recently shown increased survival compared to standard chemotherapy, but most patients do not respond and improvements are called for. Telomerase is expressed in mesothelioma cells, but only sparsely in normal tissues and is therefore an attractive target for therapeutic vaccination. Vaccination against telomerase is tolerable and has shown to induce immune responses associated with increased survival in other cancer types. There is a well-founded scientific rationale for the combination of a telomerase vaccine and checkpoint inhibition to improve treatment response in MPM patients.

methodsNIPU is a randomized, multi-centre, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without telomerase vaccine in patients with inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants (n = 118) are randomized 1:1 into two treatment arms. All participants receive treatment with nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or for a maximum of 2 years. Patients randomised to the experimental arm receive 8 intradermal injections of UV1 vaccine during the first three months of treatment. Tumour tissue, blood, urine, faeces and imaging will be collected for biomarker analyses and exploration of mechanisms for response and resistance to therapy. DISCUSSION: Checkpoint inhibition is used for treatment of mesothelioma, but many patients still do not respond. Increasing therapy response to immunotherapy is an important goal. Possible approaches include combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and other immunotherapeutic agents. Predictive biomarkers are necessary to ensure optimal treatment for each patient and to prevent unnecessary side effects. This trial seeks to improve treatment response by combining checkpoint inhibition with a telomerase vaccine and also to explore mechanisms for treatment response and resistance. Knowledge gained in the NIPU study may be transferred to the first line setting and to other cancers with limited benefit from immunotherapy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04300244, registered March 8th, 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04300244?term=NIPU&draw=2&rank=1 .

Indexed as

MesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansIpilimumabNivolumabVaccinationIpilimumabNivolumabBiomarkerhTERTImmune responseImmunotherapyIpilimumabMalignant pleural mesotheliomaNivolumabTelomerase vaccine

Identifiers

PMID34059094
PMCPMC8165504
OpenAlexW3165195007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.