Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34058981›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Comparative neurotranscriptomics reveal widespread species differences associated with bonding.

Joel A Tripp, Alejandro Berrio, Lisa A McGraw, Mikhail V Matz, Jamie K Davis, Kiyoshi Inoue, James W Thomas, Larry J Young, Steven M Phelps

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. But What Behavior?ArXiv · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The neural circuits of monogamous behavior.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joel A Tripp *Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Alejandro Berrio *Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Lisa A McGrawCenter for Translational Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Mikhail V MatzDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Jamie K DavisCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA.
Kiyoshi InoueCenter for Translational Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
James W ThomasNational Institutes of Health Intramural Sequencing Center, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Larry J Young *Center for Translational Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Steven M Phelps *Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. sphelps@utexas.edu.
Emory University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USDuke University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
The Impact of Oxytocin on the Neural Representation Social Stimuli P50MH100023 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, LARRY J · 2013 to 2022
$21.8M
The bonding brain: Substrates of social attachment in monogamous volesR01MH115267 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI OSTEN, PAVEL, PHELPS, STEVEN M · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
Integrating social and state cues that motivate vocal behaviorF32MH125562 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI TRIPP, JOEL · 2021 to 2023
$210k
NIH HHS P51 OD011132NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH125562NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH100023NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPair bonding with a reproductive partner is rare among mammals but is an important feature of human social behavior. Decades of research on monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster), along with comparative studies using the related non-bonding meadow vole (M. pennsylvanicus), have revealed many of the neural and molecular mechanisms necessary for pair-bond formation in that species. However, these studies have largely focused on just a few neuromodulatory systems. To test the hypothesis that neural gene expression differences underlie differential capacities to bond, we performed RNA-sequencing on tissue from three brain regions important for bonding and other social behaviors across bond-forming prairie voles and non-bonding meadow voles. We examined gene expression in the amygdala, hypothalamus, and combined ventral pallidum/nucleus accumbens in virgins and at three time points after mating to understand species differences in gene expression at baseline, in response to mating, and during bond formation.

resultsWe first identified species and brain region as the factors most strongly associated with gene expression in our samples. Next, we found gene categories related to cell structure, translation, and metabolism that differed in expression across species in virgins, as well as categories associated with cell structure, synaptic and neuroendocrine signaling, and transcription and translation that varied among the focal regions in our study. Additionally, we identified genes that were differentially expressed across species after mating in each of our regions of interest. These include genes involved in regulating transcription, neuron structure, and synaptic plasticity. Finally, we identified modules of co-regulated genes that were strongly correlated with brain region in both species, and modules that were correlated with post-mating time points in prairie voles but not meadow voles.

conclusionsThese results reinforce the importance of pre-mating differences that confer the ability to form pair bonds in prairie voles but not promiscuous species such as meadow voles. Gene ontology analysis supports the hypothesis that pair-bond formation involves transcriptional regulation, and changes in neuronal structure. Together, our results expand knowledge of the genes involved in the pair bonding process and open new avenues of research in the molecular mechanisms of bond formation.

Indexed as

ArvicolinaePair BondAnimalsBrainHumansSocial BehaviorSpecies SpecificityAmygdalaHypothalamusNucleus accumbensPair bondRNA-sequencingVentral pallidumVole

Identifiers

PMID34058981
PMCPMC8165761
OpenAlexW3165297621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.