Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34058901›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of public health2021

Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic among migrants: An innovative, system-level, interdisciplinary approach is needed to improve public health.

Esperanza Diaz, Svenn-Eirik Mamelund, Jarle Eid, Henriette Sinding Aasen, Oddvar Martin Kaarbøe, Rebecca Jane Cox Brokstad, Siri Gloppen, Anders Beyer, Bernadette Nirmal Kumar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A New Paradigm for Pandemic Preparedness.Current epidemiology reports · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Esperanza DiazPandemic Centre, University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-4331
Svenn-Eirik MamelundCentre for Research on Pandemics, OsloMet, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3980-3818
Jarle EidPandemic Centre, University of Bergen, Norway.
Henriette Sinding AasenPandemic Centre, University of Bergen, Norway.
Oddvar Martin KaarbøePandemic Centre, University of Bergen, Norway.
Rebecca Jane Cox BrokstadPandemic Centre, University of Bergen, Norway.
Siri GloppenPandemic Centre, University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5745-8109
Anders BeyerPandemic Centre, University of Bergen, Norway.
Bernadette Nirmal KumarUnit for Migration and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (FHI), Norway.
University of Bergen · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOSenter for Krisepsykologi · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are amplified among socially vulnerable groups, including international migrants, in terms of both disease transmission and outcomes and the consequences of mitigation measures. Migrants are overrepresented in COVID-19 laboratory-confirmed cases, hospital admissions, intensive care treatment and death statistics in all countries with available data. A syndemic approach has been suggested to understand the excess burden in vulnerable populations. However, this has not stopped the unequal burden of disease in Norway. Initially, the disease was mainly imported by Norwegians returning from skiing holidays in the Alps, and the prevalence of infection among migrants in Norway, defined as people born abroad to foreign parents, was low. Later, confirmed cases in migrants increased and have remained stable at 35-50% - more than twice the proportion of the migrant population (15%). To change this pattern, we need to understand the complex mechanisms underlying inequities in health and their relative and multiplying impacts on disease inequalities and to test the effect of counterfactual policies in order to reduce inequalities in disease burden. Yet, the current paradigm in the field of migration and health research, that is, the theories, research methods and explanatory models commonly applied, fail to fully understand the differences in health outcomes between international migrants and the host population. Here, we use the Norwegian situation as a case to explain the need for an innovative, system-level, interdisciplinary approach at a global level.

Indexed as

COVID-19Transients and MigrantsHumansNorwayPandemicsPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2COVID-19interdisciplinarityMigrantspandemicparadigm

Identifiers

PMID34058901
PMCPMC8521362
OpenAlexW3164829129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.