Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34058731›Full record

SynthesisUrologia internationalis2022

Predictive Factors in Sacral Neuromodulation: A Systematic Review.

Ranjana Jairam, Jamie Drossaerts, Tom Marcelissen, Gommert van Koeveringe, Desiree Vrijens, Philip van Kerrebroeck

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Urologia internationalis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ranjana JairamDepartment of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Mastricht, The Netherlands.
Jamie DrossaertsDepartment of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Mastricht, The Netherlands.
Tom MarcelissenDepartment of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Mastricht, The Netherlands.
Gommert van KoeveringeDepartment of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Mastricht, The Netherlands.
Desiree VrijensDepartment of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Mastricht, The Netherlands.
Philip van KerrebroeckDepartment of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Mastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an effective treatment in patients with overactive bladder syndrome or nonobstructive urinary retention when conservative treatment fails. Several factors that could impact outcome with SNM have been studied. This systematic review investigated these predictive factors and their relevance for clinical practice.

methodsSystematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted. This review is registered in the PROSPERO register (CRD42015016256).

resultsSeventy-eight studies (of which 11 abstracts) were included. Females, younger patients, and a tined lead procedure tend to be predictive in successful SNM outcome. Factors that did not influence SNM outcome were prior back surgery, surgery for stress urinary incontinence, affective symptoms, and duration of complaints. Reduced detrusor contractility is associated with a lower success rate. The level of evidence of most studies (graded according to the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine) was 3b.

conclusionEven though this systematic review investigated predictive factors (gender, age, type of procedure, type of lead, and detrusor contractility), no general consensus on predictive factors could be made. Most studies are small, retrospective, and involve a heterogeneous population. Therefore, prospective research in larger specific patient groups remains necessary to find predictors of SNM outcome.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyUrinary Bladder, OveractiveUrinary RetentionFemaleHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSacrumTreatment OutcomeLower urinary tract symptomsNonobstructive urinary retentionOveractive bladderPredictive factorsSacral neuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID34058731
PMCPMC9153358
OpenAlexW3164082287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.