Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34058563›Full record

ReviewPoultry science2021

An overview of health challenges in alternative poultry production systems.

Rim El Jeni, Dana K Dittoe, Elena G Olson, Jeferson Lourenco, Darren S Seidel, Steven C Ricke, Todd R Callaway

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Veterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Mini-Review on Multi-Hurdle Control ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  8. In vitro probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the intestines of Muscovy ducks.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects of DietaryAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Occurrence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Welfare of broilers on farm.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rim El JeniDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Dana K DittoeDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Meat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Elena G OlsonDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Meat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Jeferson LourencoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Darren S SeidelDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Steven C RickeDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Meat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Todd R CallawayDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA. Electronic address: Todd.callaway@uga.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to consumer demand and changing welfare standards on health, ecology, equity, and safety concepts, poultry production has changed markedly over the past 20 y. One of the greatest changes to poultry production standards is now offering poultry limited access to the outdoors in alternative and organic poultry production operations. Although operations allowing access to the outdoors are still only a small portion of commercial poultry production, it may impact the gastrointestinal (GIT) health of the bird in different ways than birds raised under conventional management systems. The present review describes current research results in alternative systems by identifying how different poultry production operations (diet, environmental disruptive factors, diseases) impact the ecology and health of the GIT. Various research efforts will be discussed that illustrate the nutritional value of free-range forages and how forages could be beneficial to animal health and production of both meat and eggs. The review also highlights the need for potential interventions to limit diseases without using antibiotics. These alternatives could enhance both economics and sustainability in organic and free-range poultry production.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryPoultryAnimalsChickensMeatOvumalternative poultry productiondiseaseenvironmenthealthnutrition

Identifiers

PMID34058563
PMCPMC8170424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.