Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34058366›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery2021

Prediction of Major Complications and Readmission After Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Machine Learning-Driven Approach.

Akash A Shah, Sai K Devana, Changhee Lee, Amador Bugarin, Elizabeth L Lord, Arya N Shamie, Don Y Park, Mihaela van der Schaar, Nelson F SooHoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Akash A ShahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. Electronic address: aashah@mednet.ucla.edu.
Sai K DevanaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Changhee LeeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Amador BugarinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Elizabeth L LordDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Arya N ShamieDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Don Y ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mihaela van der SchaarDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nelson F SooHooDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

Regenerative Musculoskeletal Medicine Training ProgramT32AR059033 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI John S Adams, Nicholas M. Bernthal · 2011 to 2026
$4.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR059033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the significant cost and morbidity of patients undergoing lumbar fusion, accurate preoperative risk-stratification would be of great utility. We aim to develop a machine learning model for prediction of major complications and readmission after lumbar fusion. We also aim to identify the factors most important to performance of each tested model.

methodsWe identified 38,788 adult patients who underwent lumbar fusion at any California hospital between 2015 and 2017. The primary outcome was major perioperative complication or readmission within 30 days. We build logistic regression and advanced machine learning models: XGBoost, AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting, and Random Forest. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Brier score, respectively.

resultsThere were 4470 major complications (11.5%). The XGBoost algorithm demonstrates the highest discrimination of the machine learning models, outperforming regression. The variables most important to XGBoost performance include angina pectoris, metastatic cancer, teaching hospital status, history of concussion, comorbidity burden, and workers' compensation insurance. Teaching hospital status and concussion history were not found to be important for regression.

conclusionsWe report a machine learning algorithm for prediction of major complications and readmission after lumbar fusion that outperforms logistic regression. Notably, the predictors most important for XGBoost differed from those for regression. The superior performance of XGBoost may be due to the ability of advanced machine learning methods to capture relationships between variables that regression is unable to detect. This tool may identify and address potentially modifiable risk factors, helping risk-stratify patients and decrease complication rates.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAgedAlgorithmsArea Under CurveFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentComplicationsLumbar fusionMachine learningOutcomesReadmission

Identifiers

PMID34058366
PMCPMC8338911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.