ArticleWorld neurosurgery2021
Prediction of Major Complications and Readmission After Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Machine Learning-Driven Approach.
Article in World neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Revolutionizing spinal interventions: a systematic review of artificial intelligence technology applications in contemporary surgery.BMC surgery · 2024Pooled it
- [Artificial intelligence in spinal surgery: current applications and future perspectives].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on the Management of Lumbar Degenerative Pathology: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Nomogram Development and Feature Selection Strategy Comparison for Predicting Surgical Site Infection After Lower Extremity Fracture Surgery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Risk factors for 90-day unplanned readmission after open posterior lumbar fusion in the elderly.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Predicting extended hospital stay following revision total hip arthroplasty: a machine learning model analysis based on the ACS-NSQIP database.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Advancing spine care through AI and machine learning: overview and applications.EFORT open reviews · 2024Review
- Comprehensive Proteomic Profiling of Aqueous Humor in Idiopathic Uveitis and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Syndrome.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Limitations in Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Imbalanced Binary Outcome Classification in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Revolutionizing Spinal Care: Current Applications and Future Directions of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence-based applications in shoulder surgery leaves much to be desired: a systematic review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2023Review
- Effect of Drain Duration and Output on Perioperative Outcomes and Readmissions after Lumbar Spine Surgery.Asian spine journal · 2023Article
- A Risk Calculator for the Prediction of C5 Nerve Root Palsy After Instrumented Cervical Fusion.World neurosurgery · 2022Article
- Predictive modeling for COVID-19 readmission risk using machine learning algorithms.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- An Evolution Gaining Momentum-The Growing Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Spinal Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Predicting hospital readmission risk in patients with COVID-19: A machine learning approach.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGiven the significant cost and morbidity of patients undergoing lumbar fusion, accurate preoperative risk-stratification would be of great utility. We aim to develop a machine learning model for prediction of major complications and readmission after lumbar fusion. We also aim to identify the factors most important to performance of each tested model.
methodsWe identified 38,788 adult patients who underwent lumbar fusion at any California hospital between 2015 and 2017. The primary outcome was major perioperative complication or readmission within 30 days. We build logistic regression and advanced machine learning models: XGBoost, AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting, and Random Forest. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Brier score, respectively.
resultsThere were 4470 major complications (11.5%). The XGBoost algorithm demonstrates the highest discrimination of the machine learning models, outperforming regression. The variables most important to XGBoost performance include angina pectoris, metastatic cancer, teaching hospital status, history of concussion, comorbidity burden, and workers' compensation insurance. Teaching hospital status and concussion history were not found to be important for regression.
conclusionsWe report a machine learning algorithm for prediction of major complications and readmission after lumbar fusion that outperforms logistic regression. Notably, the predictors most important for XGBoost differed from those for regression. The superior performance of XGBoost may be due to the ability of advanced machine learning methods to capture relationships between variables that regression is unable to detect. This tool may identify and address potentially modifiable risk factors, helping risk-stratify patients and decrease complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.