Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34058083›Full record

ReviewJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2021

Vascularization strategies in tissue engineering approaches for soft tissue repair.

Daniela Santos Masson-Meyers, Lobat Tayebi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Conjugation of Proangiogenic Peptide to Enhance a Soft Tissue Bioink.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniela Santos Masson-MeyersMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3195-4099
Lobat TayebiMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1947-5658

Funding

Supplement: Development of an Integrated 3D Human Osteo-Mucosal ModelR15DE027533 · NIDCR · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYEBI, LOBAT · 2018 to 2021
$816k
National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research/National Institutes of Health (NIDCR/NIH)NIDCR NIH HHS R15 DE027533NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insufficient vascularization during tissue repair is often associated with poor clinical outcomes. This is a concern especially when patients have critical-sized injuries, where the size of the defect restricts vascularity, or even in small defects that have to be treated under special conditions, such as after radiation therapy (relevant to tumor resection) that hinders vascularity. In fact, poor vascularization is one of the major obstacles for clinical application of tissue engineering methods in soft tissue repair. As a key issue, lack of graft integration, caused by inadequate vascularization after implantation, can lead to graft failure. Moreover, poor vascularization compromises the viability of cells seeded in deep portions of scaffolds/graft materials, due to hypoxia and insufficient nutrient supply. In this article we aim to review vascularization strategies employed in tissue engineering techniques to repair soft tissues. For this purpose, we start by providing a brief overview of the main events during the physiological wound healing process in soft tissues. Then, we discuss how tissue repair can be achieved through tissue engineering, and considerations with regards to the choice of scaffold materials, culture conditions, and vascularization techniques. Next, we highlight the importance of vascularization, along with strategies and methods of prevascularization of soft tissue equivalents, particularly cell-based prevascularization. Lastly, we present a summary of commonly used in vitro methods during the vascularization of tissue-engineered soft tissue constructs.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PhysiologicTissue EngineeringAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsHumansRegenerationRegenerative MedicineWound HealingBiocompatible Materialsangiogenesisprevascularizationregenerative medicinesoft tissue repairtissue engineeringvascularizationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID34058083
PMCPMC8419139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.