Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34058070›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2021

NGS-based liquid biopsy profiling identifies mechanisms of resistance to ALK inhibitors: a step toward personalized NSCLC treatment.

Estela Sánchez-Herrero, Roberto Serna-Blasco, Vadym Ivanchuk, Rosario García-Campelo, Manuel Dómine Gómez, José M Sánchez, Bartomeu Massutí, Noemi Reguart, Carlos Camps, Sandra Sanz-Moreno and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Liquid biopsy in solid tumours: expert opinion paper of the European society of pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Estela Sánchez-HerreroLiquid Biopsy Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain.
Roberto Serna-BlascoLiquid Biopsy Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain.
Vadym IvanchukLiquid Biopsy Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain.
Rosario García-CampeloMedical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, Spain.
Manuel Dómine GómezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Oncohealth Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
José M SánchezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Bartomeu MassutíMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Alicante, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain.
Noemi ReguartMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos CampsMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Spain.
Sandra Sanz-MorenoLiquid Biopsy Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain.
Silvia Calabuig-FariñasMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Spain.
Eloísa Jantus-LewintreMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Spain.
Magdalena ArnalMARGenomics, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
Dietmar Fernández-OrthEuropean Genome-phenome Archive, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1237-3192
Virginia CalvoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain.
Víctor González-RumayorAtrys Health, Barcelona, Spain.
Mariano ProvencioLiquid Biopsy Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain.
Atocha RomeroLiquid Biopsy Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1634-7397
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESUniversitat de València · ESCentre for Genomic Regulation · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite impressive and durable responses, nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors (ALK-Is) ultimately progress due to development of resistance. Here, we have evaluated the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling by next-generation sequencing (NGS) upon disease progression. We collected 26 plasma and two cerebrospinal fluid samples from 24 advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients at disease progression to an ALK-I. These samples were analyzed by NGS and digital PCR. A tool to retrieve variants at the ALK locus was developed (VALK tool). We identified at least one resistance mutation in the ALK locus in ten (38.5%) plasma samples; the G1269A and G1202R mutations were the most prevalent among patients progressing to first- and second-generation ALK-Is, respectively. Overall, 61 somatic mutations were detected in 14 genes: TP53, ALK, PIK3CA, SMAD4, MAP2K1 (MEK1), FGFR2, FGFR3, BRAF, EGFR, IDH2, MYC, MET, CCND3, and CCND1. Specifically, a deletion in exon 19 in EGFR, a non-V600 BRAF mutation (G466V), and the F129L mutation in MAP2K1 were identified in four patients who showed no objective survival benefit from ALK-Is. Potential ALK-I-resistance mutations were also found in PIK3CA and IDH2. Finally, a c-MYC gain, along with a loss of CCND1 and FGFR3, was detected in a patient progressing on a first-line treatment with crizotinib. We conclude that NGS analysis of liquid biopsies upon disease progression identified different putative ALK-I-resistance mutations in most cases and could be a valuable approach for therapy decision making.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCirculating Tumor DNADrug Resistance, NeoplasmHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLung NeoplasmsMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsCirculating Tumor DNAProtein Kinase InhibitorsALK-TKIEML4-ALKliquid biopsyNGSNSCLC

Identifiers

PMID34058070
PMCPMC8410554
OpenAlexW3164104307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.