Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34057905›Full record

ArticleStroke and vascular neurology2020

Safety and efficacy of oral antiplatelet for patients who had acute ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy.

Xiaochuan Huo, Raynald Raynald, Jing Jing, Anxin Wang, Dapeng Mo, Feng Gao, Ning Ma, Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang, Zhongrong Miao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaochuan Huo *Neurointervention center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1264-5132
Raynald Raynald *Neurointervention center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jing JingDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Anxin WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dapeng MoBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Feng GaoBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ning MaBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yilong WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yongjun WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhongrong MiaoNeurointervention center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China doctorzhongrongm@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1970-1221
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Tian Tan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTo investigate the safety and efficacy of oral antiplatelet therapy (APT) for patients who had acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), receiving endovascular therapy (EVT).

methodsPatients were divided into non-APT group and APT (single APT or dual APT (DAPT)) group. The safety and efficacy endpoints at 3-month follow-up were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH), recanalisation rate, clinical outcome and mortality.

resultsAmong 915 patients who had AIS, those in APT group (n=199) showed shorter puncture-to-recanalisation time, lower frequency of intravenous thrombolysis and more use of tirofiban compared with those in non-antiplatelet group (n=716) (p<0.05 for all). Oral APT was found to be associated with superior clinical outcome compared with non-APT (APT (44.2%) versus non-APT (41.1%)), adjusted OR=2.605, 95% CI 1.244 to 5.455, p=0.011). DAPT showed superior clinical outcome compared with non-APT (DAPT (56.5%) versus non-APT (41.1%), adjusted OR=5.405, 95% CI 1.614 to 18.102, p=0.006) and lower risk of mortality at 3-month follow-up (DAPT (4.8%) versus non-DAPT (17.7%), adjusted OR=0.008, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.441, p=0.019). There was no significant difference in sICH between the two groups.

conclusionsOral APT prior to undergoing EVT is safe and may accompany with superior clinical outcomes. DAPT may associate with superior clinical outcomes and lower risk of mortality.

Indexed as

stroke

Identifiers

PMID34057905
PMCPMC8258061
OpenAlexW3100071394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.