ReviewOncology and therapy2021
How to Optimise Extended Adjuvant Treatment with Neratinib for Patients with Early HER2+ Breast Cancer.
Review in Oncology and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Factors for Disease Recurrence in Patients with HER2+ Early Breast Cancer and Implications for Therapy: A Narrative Review.Oncology and therapy · 2026Review
- miRNAs as biomarkers of therapeutic response to HER2-targeted treatment in breast cancer: A systematic review.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024Review
- Management of Diarrhea in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neratinib: A Case Series and Summary of the Literature.Oncology and therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last 20 years, treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) early breast cancer has considerably improved. The development and addition of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab to chemotherapy in patients with early HER2+ breast cancer (EHBC) has been shown to provide improvements in both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival, with some patients having a good prognosis being candidates for chemotherapy de-escalation strategies. However, despite such promising clinical outcomes, a significant proportion of patients still recur calling for the development of new preventive approaches. To this aim, the use of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab for longer than one year or followed by lapatinib were tested without additional clinical improvement. Based on more recent advances, therapeutic strategies for patients with HER2+ tumours are now incorporating the use of newer (neo)adjuvant treatments, such as pertuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine, which have shown to further improve the invasive DFS (iDFS) benefit gained with trastuzumab. In this context, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib is approved in Europe for the extended adjuvant treatment of adult patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive HER2+ breast cancer who completed adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy less than one year ago. Clinical data have demonstrated that neratinib significantly improves iDFS when used for the total recommended duration of 12 months. This review paper provides an overview of the treatment of patients with EHBC, with a focus on the post-trastuzumab use of neratinib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.