Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34057667›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2021

Prognostic risk factors for loss of patency after femoropopliteal bailout stenting with dual-component stent: results from the TIGRIS Italian Multicenter Registry.

Maria Antonella Ruffino, Marco Fronda, Laura Bergamasco, Massimiliano Natrella, Gianluca Fanelli, Raffaello Bellosta, Matteo Pegorer, Luca Attisani, Massimo Ruggiero, Pierantonio Malfa and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Antonella RuffinoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Vascular Radiology, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Corso Bramante 88, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4357-2821
Marco FrondaRadiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova 3, Turin, Italy. mfronda@cittadellasalute.to.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1227-9040
Laura BergamascoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin-A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova 3, Turin, Italy.
Massimiliano NatrellaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Interventional Radiology, U. Parini Hospital, Via Ginevra 3, Aosta, Italy.
Gianluca FanelliDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Interventional Radiology, U. Parini Hospital, Via Ginevra 3, Aosta, Italy.
Raffaello BellostaCardiovascular Department, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Via Bissolati 57, Brescia, Italy.
Matteo PegorerCardiovascular Department, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Via Bissolati 57, Brescia, Italy.
Luca AttisaniCardiovascular Department, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Via Bissolati 57, Brescia, Italy.
Massimo RuggieroEndovascular Surgery-Vascular Surgery Unit, ASL BR1-Ospedale "A. Perrino", Strada per lo Spada 5, Brindisi, Italy.
Pierantonio MalfaUOC Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, A.O. Per L'emergenza "Cannizzaro", Via Messina 829, Catania, Italy.
Domenico Patane'UOC Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, A.O. Per L'emergenza "Cannizzaro", Via Messina 829, Catania, Italy.
Pierleone LucatelliDepartment of Radiological Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, Roma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7448-1404
Mario CoronaDepartment of Radiological Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, Roma, Italy.
Carmelo RicciInterventional Radiology Unit, Radiology Department, A.O.U. Senese, Viale Bracci 16, Siena, Italy.
Laura CandeloroInterventional Radiology Unit, Radiology Department, A.O.U. Senese, Viale Bracci 16, Siena, Italy.
Michelangelo FerriS.C. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Ospedale Umberto I, Largo Filippo Turati 62, Turin, Italy.
Sara VarelloRadiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova 3, Turin, Italy.
Lorenzo GibelloVascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino-A.O.U. Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Corso Bramante 88, Turin, Italy.
Gian Franco VeraldiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, Verona, Italy.
Luca MezzettoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, Verona, Italy.
Paolo FonioRadiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova 3, Turin, Italy.
Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese · ITOspedale Cannizzaro · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Turin · ITUniversity of Verona · ITOspedale A. Perrino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify the risk factors associated with patency loss after bailout stenting with third-generation hybrid heparin-bonded nitinol stent of the femoropopliteal segment.

methodsProspective, multicenter, single-arm registry including 156 patients (50 females, mean age 72 ± 11 years) subjected, from February 2017 to December 2018, to provisional stenting with Gore Tigris vascular stent of the distal superficial femoral artery, with or without involvement of the popliteal artery, in 9 different centers. The 194 lesions, with Rutherford score ≥ 3, were stented in case of recoil, dissection or residual stenosis not responding to percutaneous trans-luminal angioplasty (PTA). The follow-up (FU) was performed with clinical evaluation and duplex ultrasound (DUS) at 1, 6 and 12 months.

resultsThe primary patency rate was 99(95%CI 98-100)% at 1 month, 86(80-92)% at 6 months and 81(74-88)% at-12 months. After patency loss, 13/23 (56.5%) patients were re-treated, yielding a primary assisted patency of 91(86-96)% at 6 months and 88(82-94)% at 12 months and a secondary patency of 94(90-98)% at 6 months and 90(84-95)% at 12 months. Rutherford score ≥ 4 (p = 0.03) and previous severe treatments (p = 0.01) were identified as risk factors for early patency loss during FU. The involvement of the popliteal artery was not an independent risk factor for loss of patency.

conclusionsThe bailout stenting of the femoropopliteal segment with third-generation nitinol stents is a safe and effective option in case of recoil, dissection or residual stenosis not responding to PTA. Critical limb ischemia and history of previous major treatment at the same level are significant prognostic factors for patency loss during FU.

Indexed as

StentsAgedAged, 80 and overArterial Occlusive DiseasesFemaleFemoral ArteryHumansItalyMalePopliteal ArteryPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRegistriesRisk FactorsPeripheral artery diseasePopliteal arteryRisk factorsSelf-expandable metal stentsSuperficial femoral artery

Identifiers

PMID34057667
OpenAlexW3164687911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.