Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34057623›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2022

Radiological and histopathological assessment of bone infiltration in soft tissue sarcomas.

Luis Rodrigo Merino-Rueda, Irene Barrientos-Ruiz, Daniel Bernabeu-Taboada, José J Pozo-Kreilinger, Manuel Peleteiro-Pensado, José M Cordero-García, Eduardo J Ortiz-Cruz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Resection of soft tissue sarcomas on the thigh].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luis Rodrigo Merino-RuedaOrthopaedic Oncology Unit, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Avda. De Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain. rodrigomerinorueda@gmail.com.
Irene Barrientos-RuizOrthopaedic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Paseo de La Castellana, 26, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel Bernabeu-TaboadaRadiology Department, La Paz University Hospital, Paseo de La Castellana, 26, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
José J Pozo-KreilingerPathology Department, La Paz University Hospital, Paseo de La Castellana, 26, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Peleteiro-PensadoOrthopaedic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Paseo de La Castellana, 26, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
José M Cordero-GarcíaNuclear Medicine Department, La Paz University Hospital, Paseo de La Castellana, 26, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo J Ortiz-CruzOrthopaedic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Paseo de La Castellana, 26, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep soft tissue sarcomas are frequently in contact with bone. The therapeutic decision of a composite resection strategy may be challenging, which is usually based on clinical and radiological criteria. The aims of the study were to evaluate the overall frequency of bone and periosteal infiltration in these patients in whom composite resection was indicated, and evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy in this scenario.

methodsForty-nine patients with a composite surgical resection (soft tissue sarcoma and bone), treated at a single institution between 2006 and 2018, were retrospectively included. Presurgical planning of the resection limits was based on clinical and imaging findings (magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all patients (100%) and bone scintigraphy in 41 (83.7% of the cases). According to magnetic resonance imaging results, patients were divided into two groups: Group A, in which the tumor is adjacent to the bone without evidence of infiltration (n = 24, 48,9%), and Group B, patients with evidence of bone involvement by magnetic resonance imaging (n = 25, 51,1%). BS showed a pathological deposit in 28 patients (68.3%). Histological analysis of the resection specimen was preceded to identify bone and periosteal infiltration. For the analysis of the diagnostic validity of imaging tests, histological diagnosis was considered as the gold standard in the evaluation of STS bone infiltration.

resultsHistological bone infiltration was identified in 49% of patients and isolated periosteal infiltration in 14.3%. In terms of diagnostic accuracy, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy sensitivity values were 92% and 90%, and their specificity values were 91.7% and 52.4%, respectively.

conclusionsThe incidence of bone and periosteal infiltration of soft tissue sarcomas in contact with bone is high. Presurgical bone assessment by MRI has proven to be a sensitive and specific tool in the diagnosis of bone infiltration. Due to its high negative predictive value, BS is a useful test to rule out it. In those cases, in which there is suspicion of bone infiltration not confirmed by MRI, new diagnostic protocols should be established in order to avoid inappropriate resections.

Indexed as

SarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographyRetrospective StudiesBone infiltrationBone scintigraphyMagnetic resonance imagingMarginSoft tissue sarcomas

Identifiers

PMID34057623
OpenAlexW3164359853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.