ArticleClinical neuroradiology2022
Clinical outcomes of adjunct sinus stenting in dural arteriovenous fistulas : Role of flow restoration in steno-occlusion and cortical venous reflux.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Venous Sinus Stenting Alone as an Effective Treatment for Complex Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas with Sinus Thrombosis.Neurointervention · 2025Article
- Overview of multimodal MRI of intracranial Dural arteriovenous fistulas.Journal of interventional medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated the clinical outcomes and follow-up results of venous sinus stenting (VSS) for constrictive dural sinus restoration in patients with intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs). We hypothesized that this treatment would have durable benefits in such patients.
methodsPatients who underwent VSS for DAVFs with cortical venous reflux between January 2008 and June 2020 were identified after a retrospective review (n =18). Clinical and endovascular treatment data and follow-up information were reviewed.
resultsThe mean age of the 18 patients was 59.9 years. Stents were implanted in 10 previously occluded sinuses and 9 stenotic sinuses in addition to endovascular embolization. One patient received bilateral VSS. Subdural hemorrhage occurred in one patient after recanalization for embolization, followed by uneventful stenting. In 17 patients with clinical follow-up, the median follow-up time was 59.5 months (interquartile range 18 to 84 months). Of these, sixteen patients had follow-up vascular imaging, revealing AVF obliteration in 6 patients (38%) and stent patency in 11 (69%). Retreatment was performed for 8 (50%) patients. The mean follow-up modified Rankin scale score was 1.28. All patients had longstanding symptomatic improvement.
conclusionRestoration of sinus flow in DAVFs with cortical venous reflux through VSS has an acceptable complication rate and long-term symptomatic control; however, retreatment is often required, and stent occlusion is not uncommon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.