Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34057550›Full record

Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Barriers to successful dichoptic treatment for amblyopia in young children.

Aveen Kadhum, Emily T C Tan, Dennis M Levi, Linda Colpa, Maria Fronius, Huibert J Simonsz, Sjoukje E Loudon

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Randomised trial of three treatments for amblyopia: Vision therapy and patching, perceptual learning and patching alone.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Binocular Vision Anomalies: An Update on Prevalence, Impact, Technological and Treatment Developments and Current Challenges.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aveen KadhumDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Room Ee 1663, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Emily T C TanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Room Ee 1663, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dennis M LeviSchool of Optometry, Graduate Group in Vision Science and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Linda ColpaProgram in Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Maria FroniusDepartment of Ophthalmology, Child Vision Research Unit, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Huibert J SimonszDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Room Ee 1663, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sjoukje E LoudonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Room Ee 1663, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. s.loudon@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0245-4076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn an ongoing randomised clinical trial comparing dichoptic VR video games with patching for amblyopia, we evaluated any potential barriers to successful use of this novel amblyopia treatment method.

methodsFrom December 2017, all newly diagnosed amblyopic children were recruited. Excluded were children under age 4 and patients with strabismus exceeding 30PD. The video game was played for 1 h per week at the outpatient clinic under direct supervision. Records were kept of difficulties encountered during treatment and categorised into domains. Factors influencing the successful completion of this treatment were identified and related to patient characteristics.

resultsNinety-one children were recruited for the trial, 20 parents refused participation before randomisation, because of the logistical challenges the outpatient dichoptic treatment would cause them. Of the 17 children who commenced dichoptic treatment (median age 6.2 years; IQR 4.9-8.4 years), 10 did not complete treatment. Children under age 5.5 years were unable to comprehend the game settings or the game itself. Older children (N = 7; 41%) were less willing to comply with the video game. Loss of interest in the game (N = 8; 47%) was found to be a limiting factor at all ages.

conclusionHalf of the children failed to complete VR dichoptic treatment, mainly due to young age. In countries with nationwide screening where amblyopia is detected before age 6, the applicability of such dichoptic treatment is limited.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaStrabismusVideo GamesAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansSensory DeprivationVision, BinocularVisual AcuityAmblyopiaBarriers to successful treatmentDichoptic treatment

Identifiers

PMID34057550
PMCPMC8478762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.