Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34057540›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Biomechanical performance of bicortical versus pericortical bone trajectory (CBT) pedicle screws.

José M Spirig, Elin Winkler, Frédéric Cornaz, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Michael Betz, Jess G Snedeker, Jonas Widmer, Mazda Farshad

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical and radiological evaluation of cortical bone trajectory screw placement using patient-specific 3D templates: a multicentric prospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Location of pedicle screw hold in relation to bone quality and loads.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José M Spirig *Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. Jose.spirig@balgrist.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-5470-284X
Elin Winkler *Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2755-8576
Frédéric CornazDepartment of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Marie-Rosa FasserDepartment of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Michael BetzDepartment of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Jess G SnedekerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Jonas Widmer *Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Mazda Farshad *Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe cortical bone trajectory (CBT) is an alternative to the traditional pedicle screw trajectory (TT) in posterior spinal instrumentation, enhancing screw contact with cortical bone and therefore increasing fixation strength. Additional to the trajectory, insertion depth (pericortical vs. bicortical placement) could be a relevant factor affecting the fixation strength. However, the potential biomechanical benefit of a bicortical placement of CBT screws is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify the fixation strength of pericortical- versus bicortical-CBT (pCBT versus bCBT) screws in a randomized cadaveric study.

methodsPedicle screws were either placed pericortical or bicortical with a CBT in 20 lumbar vertebrae (2 × 20 instrumented pedicles) from four human spine cadavers by using patient-specific templates. Instrumented specimens underwent physiological cyclic loading testing (1'800'000 cycles, 10 Hz), including shear and tension loads as well as bending moments. Translational and angular displacements of the screws were quantified and compared between the two techniques.

resultsThere was a slight decrease in translational (0.2 mm ± 0.09 vs. 0.24 mm ± 0.11) and angular displacements (0.06° ± 0.05 vs. 0.13° ± 0.11) of bCBT screws when compared with pCBT screws after 1'800'000 cycles. However, the results were non-significant (p > 0.05).

conclusionThe authors do not recommend placing CBT screws bicortically, as no relevant biomechanical advantage is gained while the potential risk for iatrogenic injury to structures anterior to the spine is increased.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsSpinal FusionBiomechanical PhenomenaBone and BonesCortical BoneHumansLumbar VertebraeBiomechanical testingFixation strengthLumbar CBT pedicle screwPericortical vs. bicorticalPhysiological cyclic loading

Identifiers

PMID34057540
OpenAlexW3164641224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.