Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34057250›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2022

The relative importance of COVID-19 pandemic impacts on biodiversity conservation globally.

David W Gibbons, Chris Sandbrook, William J Sutherland, Rezvin Akter, Richard Bradbury, Steven Broad, Andy Clements, Humphrey Q P Crick, Joanna Elliott, Ngawang Gyeltshen and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The relative importance of COVID-19 pandemic impacts on biodiversity conservation globally.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

David W GibbonsRSPB Centre for Conservation Science, The Lodge, Bedfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8361-597X
Chris SandbrookDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
William J SutherlandConservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6498-0437
Rezvin Akter7/1 R.K. Mission Road, Tikatuly, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Richard BradburyRSPB Centre for Conservation Science, The Lodge, Bedfordshire, UK.
Steven BroadTRAFFIC, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1826-6400
Andy ClementsBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK.
Humphrey Q P CrickNatural England, Eastbrook, Cambridge, UK.
Joanna ElliottFauna & Flora International, Cambridge, UK.
Ngawang GyeltshenChangzamtog, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Melanie HeathBirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Jonathan HughesUN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Richard K B JenkinsGlobal Species Programme, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Cambridge, UK.
Alastair H JonesEco Logical Australia Pty Ltd, Sutherland, New South Wales, Australia.
Rocio Lopez de la LamaInstitute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6696-5401
Nicholas B W MacfarlaneScience & Knowledge, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Washington DC, USA.
Mike MaunderCambridge Conservation Initiative, Cambridge, UK.
Ravikash PrasadLot 11, Vuci Road, Nausori, Fiji.
Alfredo Romero-MuñozGeography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Noa SteinerDepartment of Agricultural Economics, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
James Tremlett12 Whanake Street, Porirua, New Zealand.
Rosie TrevelyanTropical Biology Association, Cambridge, UK.
Savita VijaykumarEarth CoLab, Bangalore, India.
Irushinie WedageParley for the Oceans, New York, NY, USA.
Nancy OckendonCambridge Conservation Initiative, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5055-1079

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an enormous impact on almost all aspects of human society and endeavor; the natural world and its conservation have not been spared. Through a process of expert consultation, we identified and categorized, into 19 themes and 70 subthemes, the ways in which biodiversity and its conservation have been or could be affected by the pandemic globally. Nearly 60% of the effects have been broadly negative. Subsequently, we created a compendium of all themes and subthemes, each with explanatory text, and in August 2020 a diverse group of experienced conservationists with expertise from across sectors and geographies assessed each subtheme for its likely impact on biodiversity conservation globally. The 9 subthemes ranked highest all have a negative impact. These were, in rank order, governments sidelining the environment during their economic recovery, reduced wildlife-based tourism income, increased habitat destruction, reduced government funding, increased plastic and other solid waste pollution, weakening of nature-friendly regulations and their enforcement, increased illegal harvest of wild animals, reduced philanthropy, and threats to survival of conservation organizations. In combination, these impacts present a worrying future of increased threats to biodiversity conservation but reduced capacity to counter them. The highest ranking positive impact, at 10, was the beneficial impact of wildlife-trade restrictions. More optimistically, among impacts ranked 11-20, 6 were positive and 4 were negative. We hope our assessment will draw attention to the impacts of the pandemic and, thus, improve the conservation community's ability to respond to such threats in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansSARS-CoV-2ambienteassessmentcompendiocompendiumcoronavirusenvironmentevaluaciónfaunanaturalezanaturewildlife

Identifiers

PMID34057250
PMCPMC8239704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.