ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2022
The relative importance of COVID-19 pandemic impacts on biodiversity conservation globally.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- COVID-19 could accelerate the decline in recreational hunting: A natural experiment from Northern Italy.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- The threat of COVID-19 to the conservation of Tanzanian national parks.Biological conservation · 2023Article
- COVID-19's Impact on the Pan African Sanctuary Alliance: Challenging Times and Resilience from Its Members.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Drivers of public plastic (mis)use - New insights from changes in single-use plastic usage during the Covid-19 pandemic.The Science of the total environment · 2022Article
- COVID-19 vaccine-induced recovery and the implications of vaccine apartheid on the global tourism industry.Physics and chemistry of the earth (2002) · 2022Article
- Political polarization of conservation issues in the era of COVID-19: An examination of partisan perspectives and priorities in the United States.Journal for nature conservation · 2022Article
- The relative importance of COVID-19 pandemic impacts on biodiversity conservation globally.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022Article
- COVID-19 lockdowns reveal the resilience of Adriatic Sea fisheries to forced fishing effort reduction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has had an enormous impact on almost all aspects of human society and endeavor; the natural world and its conservation have not been spared. Through a process of expert consultation, we identified and categorized, into 19 themes and 70 subthemes, the ways in which biodiversity and its conservation have been or could be affected by the pandemic globally. Nearly 60% of the effects have been broadly negative. Subsequently, we created a compendium of all themes and subthemes, each with explanatory text, and in August 2020 a diverse group of experienced conservationists with expertise from across sectors and geographies assessed each subtheme for its likely impact on biodiversity conservation globally. The 9 subthemes ranked highest all have a negative impact. These were, in rank order, governments sidelining the environment during their economic recovery, reduced wildlife-based tourism income, increased habitat destruction, reduced government funding, increased plastic and other solid waste pollution, weakening of nature-friendly regulations and their enforcement, increased illegal harvest of wild animals, reduced philanthropy, and threats to survival of conservation organizations. In combination, these impacts present a worrying future of increased threats to biodiversity conservation but reduced capacity to counter them. The highest ranking positive impact, at 10, was the beneficial impact of wildlife-trade restrictions. More optimistically, among impacts ranked 11-20, 6 were positive and 4 were negative. We hope our assessment will draw attention to the impacts of the pandemic and, thus, improve the conservation community's ability to respond to such threats in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.