Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34057218›Full record

ReviewJournal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics2021

Grapiprant: A snapshot of the current knowledge.

Irene Sartini, Mario Giorgi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Grapiprant in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Differential lipid signaling from CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Grapiprant: A snapshot of the current knowledge.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene SartiniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0538-4563
Mario GiorgiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3657-4703
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grapiprant is the pioneer member of the novel piprant class, a potent and specific antagonist of the prostaglandin E2 receptor 4. It has been approved in veterinary medicine for the control of pain and inflammation associated with osteoarthritis in dogs at the dose regimen of 2 mg/kg once a day by the FDA and EMA (for pain only) in 2016 and 2018, respectively. The aim of this narrative review was to report the analytical methods, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of grapiprant in several animal species using the best available published scientific evidence. In conclusion, most of the analytical methods proposed for grapiprant detection are simple, reliable, sensitive and validated. The pharmacokinetics show discrepancies between animal species. The therapeutic efficacy seems more suited to chronic rather than acute pain.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesOsteoarthritisAnimalsBenzenesulfonamidesDinoprostoneDogsImidazolesPainPyridinesSulfonylurea CompoundsBenzenesulfonamidesDinoprostonegrapiprantImidazolesPyridinesSulfonylurea Compoundsanalytical methodgrapiprantpharmacodynamicspharmacokineticsreviewsafety

Identifiers

PMID34057218
PMCPMC8518515
OpenAlexW3165581690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.