Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34057205›Full record

ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2021

Challenges in providing residual risks in carrier testing.

Robert Luke Nussbaum, Robert Nathan Slotnick, Neil J Risch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. [Carrier screening for 223 monogenic diseases in Chinese population: a multi-center study in 33 104 individuals].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert Luke NussbaumInvitae Corporation and Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3445-8880
Robert Nathan SlotnickInstitute for Human Genetics and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Neil J RischInstitute for Human Genetics and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Sharing Aggregate Genomics Research Findings with Diverse Participants: A Pilot Study of an Innovative Design StrategyU01HG009599 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KOENIG, BARBARA A., KWOK, PUI-YAN · 2017 to 2021
$16.3M
Population-based pharmacogenomic assessment of QT prolongationR01HL140924 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI IRIBARREN, CARLOS · 2018 to 2021
$3.0M
Statin Treatment and Incident Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in a Large, Multi-ethnic Health PlanRF1AG069259 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GLYMOUR, MEDELLENA MARIA, KRAUSS, RONALD M · 2020 to 2020
$3.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009599NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL140924NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG069259NIH HHS HG009599NIH HHS NHLBI AG 069259NIH HHS NHLBI HL140924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The probability an individual is a carrier for a recessive disorder despite a negative carrier test, referred to as residual risk, has been part of carrier screening for over 2 decades. Residual risks are calculated by subtracting the frequency of carriers of pathogenic variants detected by the test from the carrier frequency in a population, estimated from the incidence of the disease. Estimates of the incidence (and therefore carrier frequency) of many recessive disorders differ among different population groups and are inaccurate or unavailable for many genes on large carrier screening panels for most of the world's populations. The pathogenic variants detected by the test and their frequencies also vary across groups and over time as variants are newly discovered or reclassified, which requires today's residual carrier risks to be continually updated. Even when a residual carrier risk is derived using accurate data obtained in a particular group, it may not apply to many individuals in that group because of misattributed ancestry or unsuspected admixture. Missing or inaccurate data, the challenge of determining meaningful ancestry-specific risks and applying them appropriately, and a lack of evidence they impact management, suggest that patients be counseled that although carrier screening may miss a small fraction of carriers, residual risks with contemporary carrier screening are well below the risk posed by invasive prenatal diagnosis, even if one member of the couple is a carrier, and that efforts to provide precise residual carrier risks are unnecessary.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisGenetic Carrier ScreeningHumansRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID34057205
PMCPMC8453722
OpenAlexW3163973958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.