ArticleEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care2021
Joint EAPCI/ACVC expert consensus document on percutaneous ventricular assist devices.
Article in European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- IMPELLA COMPARED TO VENOARTERIAL EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION IN CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED STUDIES.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2025Pooled it
- Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients in Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Cardiac Surgery: Protected Cardiac Surgery Concept.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Multidisciplinary Optimization Design of pVADs Using Analytical Target Cascading-Guided Genetic Algorithm.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Patient selection for complex, high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: an overview.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Contemporary evidence in protected percutaneous coronary intervention: a case-based review.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Arterial Versus Mixed Venous Lactate Levels in 1526 Cardiac Intensive Care Patients.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Article
- Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a contemporary head-to-head comparison.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Cardiogenic Shock Systems of Care Best Practices. Part 2: The Shock Team and Inpatient Management.US cardiology · 2026Review
- Circulatory Support for High-Risk Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Coronary Interventions: Where is the Evidence?The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2025Review
- UNLOADERS-PVAD Weaning Score: predicting post-weaning adverse events in cardiogenic shock patients supported by microaxial flow pump.Journal of intensive care · 2025Article
- Patterns of Disease Progression and Outcomes of Inferior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: The Multicenter INSTINCT Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of an Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Who Received Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Why left atrial venting fails to influence extracorporeal life support survival in cardiogenic shock: Unravelling the intricate reality of unloading.European journal of heart failure · 2025Article
- Brazil's First High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Hemodynamic Support from a Percutaneous Pulsatile Device: A Case Report.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Echocardiography for short-term mechanical circulatory support: a trans-Atlantic practical guide.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Review
- Pulsatile Left Ventricular Assistance in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Short-Term Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Haemodynamic implications of VA-ECMO vs. VA-ECMO plus Impella CP for cardiogenic shock in a large animal model.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Mushroom poisoning with cardiogenic shock caused byEuropean heart journal. Case reports · 2024Article
- Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- Diagnosis and treatment of right ventricular failure secondary to acutely increased right ventricular afterload (acute cor pulmonale): a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care of the European Society of Cardiology.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 16 institutions in 12 countries.
Funding
Abstract
There has been a significant increase in the use of short-term percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs) as acute circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and to provide haemodynamic support during interventional procedures, including high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. Although frequently considered together, pVADs differ in their haemodynamic effects, management, indications, insertion techniques, and monitoring requirements. This consensus document summarizes the views of an expert panel by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and the Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC) and appraises the value of short-term pVAD. It reviews the pathophysiological context and possible indications for pVAD in different clinical settings and provides guidance regarding the management of pVAD based on existing evidence and best current practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.