Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34057071›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2021

Joint EAPCI/ACVC expert consensus document on percutaneous ventricular assist devices.

Alaide Chieffo, Dariusz Dudek, Christian Hassager, Alain Combes, Mario Gramegna, Sigrun Halvorsen, Kurt Huber, Vijay Kunadian, Jiri Maly, Jacob Eifer Møller and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06475456 (SPOKE-HUB SHOCK PROTOCOL MANAGEMENT ACCORDING TO SCAI CLASS IN TURIN AND MILAN AREA), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06475456 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Spoke-hub shock protocol management according to scai class in turin and milan area

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFondazione GISE OnlusRan2024 to 2026Enrolled786ConditionsCardiogenic Shock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Outcomes of high-risk PCI assisted by VA-ECMO with local anaesthesia.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients requiring prolonged mechanical circulatory support after high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  19. High-risk PCI: one device cannot fix it all.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 16 institutions in 11 countries.

Alaide ChieffoInterventional Cardiology Unit San Raffaele Scientific Institute - Milan, Italy.
Dariusz Dudek
Christian Hassager
Alain Combes
Mario Gramegna
Sigrun Halvorsen
Kurt Huber
Vijay Kunadian
Jiri Maly
Jacob Eifer Møller
Federico Pappalardo
Giuseppe Tarantini
Guido Tavazzi
Holger Thiele
Christophe Vandenbriele
Nicolas Van Mieghem
Pascal Vranckx
Nikos Werner
Susanna Price
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · GBSan Raffaele University of Rome · ITErasmus MC · NLHasselt University · BEInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZIstituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione · ITJagiellonian University · PLKrankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder · DELeipzig University · DENewcastle University · GBSigmund Freud University · ITUnité de recherche sur les maladies cardiovasculaires et métaboliques · FRUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a significant increase in the use of short-term percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs) as acute circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and to provide haemodynamic support during interventional procedures, including high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. Although frequently considered together, pVADs differ in their haemodynamic effects, management, indications, insertion techniques, and monitoring requirements. This consensus document summarizes the views of an expert panel by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and the Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC) and appraises the value of short-term pVAD. It reviews the pathophysiological context and possible indications for pVAD in different clinical settings and provides guidance regarding the management of pVAD based on existing evidence and best current practice.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular SystemHeart-Assist DevicesPercutaneous Coronary InterventionConsensusHumansShock, Cardiogenic

Identifiers

PMID34057071
PMCPMC9709772
OpenAlexW3165563737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.