Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34056984›Full record

ArticleOmega2023

Clinicians' Experience of Collaboration in the Treatment of Suicidal Clients Within the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality Framework.

Bríd Fogarty, Sharon Houghton, Eoin Galavan, Páraic S O'Súilleabháin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bríd FogartyDepartment of Psychology, University of Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8843-7658
Sharon HoughtonDepartment of Psychology, University of Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8097-4205
Eoin GalavanHealth Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
Páraic S O'SúilleabháinDepartment of Psychology, University of Limerick, Ireland.
University of Limerick · IEHealth Service Executive · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is little known about the clinicians' experience of collaboration using the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicide (CAMS) framework. This study aimed to give voice to the clinician experience.

methodA qualitative design utilised semi-structured interviews with ten psychologists who worked in a Suicide Assessment and Treatment Service (SATS) in Ireland which utilises the CAMS framework.

resultsAn Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach revealed several important findings. The superordinate themes included 'Finding Safety', 'Regulation of the Self', 'Connecting', and 'Systemic Challenges'. DISCUSSION: The CAMS framework plays an important role in providing a safe base for the clinician (in terms of understanding suicidality, in addition to the structures of the framework). It provides a mechanism in which to process difficult emotions, and a way of communicating a formulation of suicide to the treating team. Importantly, the CAMS emerged as facilitating a collaborative, therapeutic way of working.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationSuicideHumansIrelandSuicide PreventioncliniciansCollaborative Assessment and Management of Suicideinterpretative phenomenological analysissuicidal interventionsuicidality

Identifiers

PMID34056984
PMCPMC10227097
OpenAlexW3164040190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.