Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34056876›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2021

Risk factors of African swine fever virus in suspected infected pigs in smallholder farming systems in South-Kivu province, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Patrick N Bisimwa, Michel Dione, Bisimwa Basengere, Ciza Arsène Mushagalusa, Lucilla Steinaa, Juliette Ongus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Patrick N BisimwaDepartment of Animal Sciences and Production, Université Evangélique en Afrique, Bukavu 3323, Democratic Republic of Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4020-2411
Michel DioneInternational Livestock Research Institute, Dakar 24265, Senegal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7812-5776
Bisimwa BasengereDepartment of Animal Sciences and Production, Université Evangélique en Afrique, Bukavu 3323, Democratic Republic of Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0748-3573
Ciza Arsène MushagalusaDepartment of Animal Sciences and Production, Université Evangélique en Afrique, Bukavu 3323, Democratic Republic of Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-116X
Lucilla SteinaaInternational Livestock Research Institute, Dakar 24265, Senegal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3691-3971
Juliette OngusDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Pan African University Institute of Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovation, Nairobi 62000-00200, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-3482
Université Evangélique en Afrique · CDInternational Livestock Research Institute · KEJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrican swine fever (ASF) is an infectious viral disease of domestic pigs that presents as a hemorrhagic fever, and for which no effective vaccine is available. The disease has a serious negative social and economic impact on pig keepers. There is limited information on the potential risk factors responsible for the spread of ASF in South Kivu.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the potential risk factors associated with ASF infection in suspected ASF virus (ASFV)-infected pigs.

methodsWe sampled whole blood from 391 pigs. Additionally, 300 pig farmers were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Viral DNA was detected by using the real-time polymerase chain reaction technique.

resultsThe majority of pigs sampled, 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.4-82.6), were of local breeds. Over half, 60.4% (95% CI, 55.5-65.2), were female, and most of them, 90.5% (95% CI, 87.6-93.4), were adult pigs (> 1 year old). Viral DNA was detected in 72 of the 391 sampled pigs, indicating an overall infection rate of 18.4% (95% CI, 14.5-22.4). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed several risk factors positively associated with ASFV infection: feeding with swill in pen (odds ratio [OR], 3.8; 95% CI, 2.12-6.77); mixed ages of pigs in the same pen (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.99-5.57); introduction of new animals to the farm (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.91-15.28). The risk factors that were negatively (protective) correlated with ASFV positivity were the presence of male animals and the use of an in-pen breeding system.

conclusionLocal pig farmers should be encouraged to adopt proper husbandry and feeding practices in order to increase the number of ASF-free farms.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusAnimal HusbandryAnimalsDemocratic Republic of the CongoDNA, ViralPrevalenceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRisk FactorsSus scrofaSwineDNA, ViralAfrican swine feverdiagnosisdomestic pigsepidemiologytransmission

Identifiers

PMID34056876
PMCPMC8170224
OpenAlexW3162165455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.