Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34056827›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2021

Climate change effects on animal ecology: butterflies and moths as a case study.

Geena M Hill, Akito Y Kawahara, Jaret C Daniels, Craig C Bateman, Brett R Scheffers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microclimate-based oviposition site selection in butterflies and moths.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impacts of warmer temperatures on secondary seed dispersal byCurrent research in insect science · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geena M HillFlorida Natural Areas Inventory, Florida State University, 1018 Thomasville Rd., #200-C, Tallahassee, FL, 323303, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-2393-9611
Akito Y KawaharaFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 3215 Hull Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32611, U.S.A.
Jaret C DanielsFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 3215 Hull Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32611, U.S.A.
Craig C BatemanFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 3215 Hull Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32611, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-4439-2571
Brett R ScheffersDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, 110 Newins-Ziegler Hall, P.O. Box 110430, Gainesville, FL, 32611, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) are one of the most studied, diverse, and widespread animal groups, making them an ideal model for climate change research. They are a particularly informative model for studying the effects of climate change on species ecology because they are ectotherms that thermoregulate with a suite of physiological, behavioural, and phenotypic traits. While some species have been negatively impacted by climatic disturbances, others have prospered, largely in accordance with their diversity in life-history traits. Here we take advantage of a large repertoire of studies on butterflies and moths to provide a review of the many ways in which climate change is impacting insects, animals, and ecosystems. By studying these climate-based impacts on ecological processes of Lepidoptera, we propose appropriate strategies for species conservation and habitat management broadly across animals.

Indexed as

ButterfliesMothsAnimalsClimate ChangeEcologyEcosystemasynchronybutterflyinsectmorphologymothparasitoidphenologyrange shifttrophic mismatchvoltinism

Identifiers

PMID34056827
PMCPMC8518917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.