Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34056687›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2022

How patients being treated for non-small cell lung cancer value treatment benefit despite side effects.

Mona L Martin, Julia Correll, Andrew Walding, Anna Rydén

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01802632 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Anti-tumour Activity of AZD9291 in Patients With Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Progressed on Prior Therapy With an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Agent

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2013 to 2023Enrolled603ConditionsAdvanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, Advanced (Inoperable) Non Small Cell Lung CancerArmsAZD9291
NCT02352948 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Open Label, Randomised, Multi-centre, International Study of MEDI4736, Given as Monotherapy or in Combination With Tremelimumab Determined by PD-L1 Expression Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Stage IIIB-IV) Who Have Received at Least Two Prior Systemic Treatment Regimens Including One Platinum Based Chemotherapy Regimen and Do Not Have Known EGFR TK Activating Mutations or ALK Rearrangements (ARCTIC).

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2015 to 2023Enrolled597ConditionsNon - Small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLCArmsMEDI4736 (durvalumab), Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Erlotinib, MEDI4736 (durvalumab) in combination with tremelimumab (anti-CTLA4)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mona L MartinHealth Research Associates, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA.
Julia CorrellHealth Research Associates, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew WaldingAstraZeneca R&D, Cambridge, UK.
Anna RydénAstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden. anna.ryden@astrazeneca.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe symptoms and side effects experienced by patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), assess how patients allocate sensations (i.e. symptoms or side effects) to either the disease or its treatment, and evaluate how patients balance side effects with treatment benefits.

methodsQualitative sub-studies were conducted as part of two clinical trials in patients treated for advanced NSCLC (AURA [NCT01802632]; ARCTIC [NCT02352948]).

resultsInterviews were conducted with 23 patients and 19 patients in the AURA and ARCTIC sub-studies, respectively. The most commonly experienced symptoms/side effects were respiratory (81% of patients), digestive (76%), pain and discomfort (76%), energy-related (71%), and sensory (62%). Patients identified a sensation as a treatment side effect if they had not experienced it before, if there was a temporal link between the sensation and receipt of treatment, and/or if their doctors consistently told or asked them about it in relation to side effects. Themes that emerged when patients talked about their cancer treatment and its side effects related to the serious nature of their advanced disease and their treatment expectations. Patients focused on treatment benefits, wanting a better quality of life, being hopeful, not really having a choice, and not thinking about side effects.

conclusionsIn these two qualitative sub-studies, patients with advanced NSCLC valued the benefits of their treatment regardless of side effects that they experienced. Patients weighed their options against the seriousness of their disease and expressed their willingness to tolerate their side effects in return for receiving continued treatment benefits.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsLung NeoplasmsHumansQuality of LifeInterview studiesNon-small cell lung cancerQualitativeSide effectsSymptomsTreatment benefit

Identifiers

PMID34056687
PMCPMC8800875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.