Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34056634›Full record

ArticleJACS Au2021

Rapid Screening of Diverse Biotransformations for Enzyme Evolution.

Emily E Kempa, James L Galman, Fabio Parmeggiani, James R Marshall, Julien Malassis, Clement Q Fontenelle, Jean-Baptiste Vendeville, Bruno Linclau, Simon J Charnock, Sabine L Flitsch and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACS Au, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early-stage drug discovery in a new-generation ultrahigh-throughput mass spectrometry platform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emily E KempaSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6481-7974
James L GalmanSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2076-2806
Fabio ParmeggianiDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "G. Natta", Politecnico di Milano, Via Mancinelli 7, 20131 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5861-9269
James R MarshallSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.
Julien MalassisSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield, SO17 1BJ Southampton, United Kingdom.
Clement Q FontenelleSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield, SO17 1BJ Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jean-Baptiste VendevilleSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield, SO17 1BJ Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5790-6968
Bruno LinclauSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield, SO17 1BJ Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8762-0170
Simon J CharnockProzomix Ltd., Building 4, West End Ind. Estate, Haltwhistle, Northumberland NE49 9HA, United Kingdom.
Sabine L FlitschSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3974-646X
Nicholas J TurnerSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8708-0781
Perdita E BarranSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7720-586X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of label-free high-throughput screening technologies presents a major bottleneck in the identification of active and selective biocatalysts, with the number of variants often exceeding the capacity of traditional analytical platforms to assess their activity in a practical time scale. Here, we show the application of direct infusion of biotransformations to the mass spectrometer (DiBT-MS) screening to a variety of enzymes, in different formats, achieving sample throughputs equivalent to ∼40 s per sample. The heat map output allows rapid selection of active enzymes within 96-well plates facilitating identification of industrially relevant biocatalysts. This DiBT-MS screening workflow has been applied to the directed evolution of a phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) as a case study, enhancing its activity toward electron-rich cinnamic acid derivatives which are relevant to lignocellulosic biomass degradation. Additional benefits of the screening platform include the discovery of biocatalysts (kinases, imine reductases) with novel activities and the incorporation of ion mobility technology for the identification of product hits with increased confidence.

Identifiers

PMID34056634
PMCPMC8154213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.